What is the best practice in the .NET world to manage transitive dependencies that cause version conflict ?
In details : Project A Depends on Project B which in turn depends on library C
also
Project A also depends on Project X which depends on a DIFFERENT and (potentially) incompatible version of library C.
A->B->Cv1.0
&
A->X->Cv2.0
where
Cv1.0 <> Cv2.0
Is there a way to make this work ?
Can it be done WITHOUT using the GAC ?
Can it be done even if B and X are in binary format only (source not accessible) ?
In other words is there a way where I can have Project B and X each using their own dependencies when used together in Project A without causing conflicts.
NOTE: I realize that ideally I should not have this problem at all but as reliance on external libraries expands this will be an unavoidable side effect. So I am wondering should it occur how best to deal with it.
There are a lot of similar questions On Stack Overflow. For e.g. Referencing 2 different versions of log4net in the same solution
Summary:
<configuration> <runtime> <assemblyBinding xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1"> <dependentAssembly> <assemblyIdentity name="C" publicKeyToken="C's public key token" /> <codeBase version="version string for C1.0 e.g. 1.0.0.0" href="1.0\C.dll" /> <codeBase version="version string for C2.0 e.g. 2.0.0.0" href="2.0\C.dll" /> </assemblyIdentity> </dependentAssembly> </assemblyBinding> </runtime> </configuration>
you can get the public key token of C using sn -T C.dll
If v1.0 and v2.0 of C have different public key (though ideally they shouldn't) then include two dependentAssembly tags.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With