The result of subscribe is not used

Question

The IDE does not know what potential effects your subscription can have when it's not disposed, so it treats it as potentially unsafe. For example, your Single may contain a network call, which could cause a memory leak if your Activity is abandoned during its execution.

A convenient way to manage a large amount of Disposables is to use a CompositeDisposable; just create a new CompositeDisposable instance variable in your enclosing class, then add all your Disposables to the CompositeDisposable (with RxKotlin you can just append addTo(compositeDisposable) to all of your Disposables). Finally, when you're done with your instance, call compositeDisposable.dispose().

This will get rid of the lint warnings, and ensure your Disposables are managed properly.

In this case, the code would look like:

CompositeDisposable compositeDisposable = new CompositeDisposable();

Disposable disposable = Single.just(db)
        .subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
        .subscribe(db -> db.get(1)));

compositeDisposable.add(disposable); //IDE is satisfied that the Disposable is being managed. 
disposable.addTo(compositeDisposable); //Alternatively, use this RxKotlin extension function.


compositeDisposable.dispose(); //Placed wherever we'd like to dispose our Disposables (i.e. in onDestroy()).

The moment the Activity will be destroyed, the list of Disposables gets cleared and we’re good.

io.reactivex.disposables.CompositeDisposable mDisposable;

    mDisposable = new CompositeDisposable();

    mDisposable.add(
            Single.just(db)
                    .subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
                    .subscribe(db -> db.get(1)));

    mDisposable.dispose(); // dispose wherever is required

You can subscribe with DisposableSingleObserver:

Single.just(db)
    .subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
    .subscribe(new DisposableSingleObserver<Object>() {
            @Override
            public void onSuccess(Object obj) {
                // work with the resulting todos...
                dispose();
            }

            @Override
            public void onError(Throwable e) {
                // handle the error case...
                dispose();
            }});

In case you need to directly dispose Single object (e.g. before it emits) you can implement method onSubscribe(Disposable d) to get and use the Disposable reference.

You can also realize SingleObserver interface by your own or use other child classes.

As was suggested you may use some global CompositeDisposable to add the result of the subscribe operation there.

The RxJava2Extensions library contains useful methods to automatically remove created disposable from the CompositeDisposable when it completes. See subscribeAutoDispose section.

In your case it may look like this

SingleConsumers.subscribeAutoDispose(
    Single.just(db)
            .subscribeOn(Schedulers.io()),
    composite,
    db -> db.playerDao().getAll())

You can use Uber AutoDispose and rxjava .as

        Single.just(db)
            .subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
            .as(AutoDispose.autoDisposable(AndroidLifecycleScopeProvider.from(this)))
            .subscribe(db -> db.playerDao().getAll());

Make sure that you understand when you unsubscribe based on the ScopeProvider.

Again and again I find myself coming back to the question of how to correctly dispose of subscriptions, and to this posting in particular. Several blogs and talks claim that failing to call dispose necessarily leads to a memory leak, which I think is a too general statement. In my understanding, the lint warning about not storing the result of subscribe is a non-issue in some cases, because:

• Not all observables run in the context of an Android activity
• The observable can be synchronous
• Dispose is called implicitly, provided the observable completes

Since I don't want to suppress lint warnings I recently started to use the following pattern for cases with a synchronous observable:

var disposable: Disposable? = null

disposable = Observable
   .just(/* Whatever */)
   .anyOperator()
   .anyOtherOperator()
   .subscribe(
      { /* onSuccess */ },
      { /* onError */ },
      {
         // onComplete
         // Make lint happy. It's already disposed because the stream completed.
         disposable?.dispose()
      }
   )

I'd be interested in any comments on this, regardless of whether it's a confirmation of correctness or the discovery of a loophole.