I'm using a restful url to kick off a long-running backend process (it is normally on a cron schedule, but we want the ability to kick it off manually).
The code below works and I see the result in the browser when I test manually.
@ResponseBody
@RequestMapping(value = "/trigger/{jobName}", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public Callable<TriggerResult> triggerJob(@PathVariable final String jobName) {
return new Callable<TriggerResult>() {
@Override
public TriggerResult call() throws Exception {
// Code goes here to locate relevant job and kick it off, waiting for result
String message = <result from my job>;
return new TriggerResult(SUCCESS, message);
}
};
}
When I test this without the Callable
I used the code below and it all works (I changed the expected error message to simplify post).
mockMvc.perform(get("/trigger/job/xyz"))
.andExpect(status().isOk())
.andDo(print())
.andExpect(jsonPath("status").value("SUCCESS"))
.andExpect(jsonPath("message").value("A meaningful message appears"));
When I added the Callable
however it does not work. I also tried below but it did not work. Anyone else had success?
mockMvc.perform(get("/trigger/job/xyz"))
.andExpect(status().isOk())
.andDo(print())
.andExpect(request().asyncResult(jsonPath("status").value("SUCCESS")))
.andExpect(request().asyncResult(jsonPath("message").value("A meaningful message appears")));
Below is the relevant part from my print(). Looks like mockMvc can't untangle the Json correctly in this case (even though it works in my browser)? When I do this without Callable
I see full JSON.
MockHttpServletRequest:
HTTP Method = GET
Request URI = /trigger/job/xyz
Parameters = {}
Headers = {}
Handler:
Type = foo.bar.web.controller.TriggerJobController
Method = public java.util.concurrent.Callable<foo.bar.myproject.web.model.TriggerResult> foo.bar.myproject.web.controller.TriggerJobController.triggerJob(java.lang.String)
Async:
Was async started = true
Async result = foo.bar.myproject.web.model.TriggerResult@67aa1e71
Resolved Exception:
Type = null
ModelAndView:
View name = null
View = null
Model = null
FlashMap:
MockHttpServletResponse:
Status = 200
Error message = null
Headers = {}
Content type = null
Body =
Forwarded URL = null
Redirected URL = null
Cookies = []
Bud's answer really helped point me in the right direction however it didn't quite work because it did not wait for the async result. Since posting this question, the spring-mvc-showcase samples (https://github.com/SpringSource/spring-mvc-showcase) have been updated.
It seems like in the first part of the call when you retrieve the MvcResult, you need to assert on an asyncResult() and in the case of JSON pojo mapping you need to assert on the actual type itself (not JSON). So I needed to add the third line below to Bud's answer, then the rest just works.
MvcResult mvcResult = this.mockMvc.perform(get("/trigger/job/xyz"))
.andExpect(request().asyncStarted())
.andExpect(request().asyncResult(instanceOf(TriggerResult.class)))
.andReturn();
this.mockMvc.perform(asyncDispatch(mvcResult))
.andExpect(status().isOk())
.andExpect(content().contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON))
.andExpect(jsonPath("status").value("SUCCESS"))
.andExpect(jsonPath("message").value("A meaningful message appears"));
Note: instanceOf()
is org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.instanceOf
. To get access to Hamcrest libraries include the latest hamcrest-library
jar.
For maven ...
<dependency>
<groupId>org.hamcrest</groupId>
<artifactId>hamcrest-library</artifactId>
<version>LATEST VERSION HERE</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With