UPDATE table SET col = new_value WHERE col = old_value AND other_col = some_other_value; UPDATE table SET col = new_value WHERE col = old_value OR other_col = some_other_value; As you can see, you can expand the WHERE clause as much as you'd like in order to filter down the rows for updating to what you need.
To update multiple columns use the SET clause to specify additional columns. Just like with the single columns you specify a column and its new value, then another set of column and values. In this case each column is separated with a column.
You can use the non-standard FROM clause.
UPDATE b
SET column1 = a.column1,
column2 = a.column2,
column3 = a.column3
FROM a
WHERE a.id = b.id
AND b.id = 1
The question is old but I felt the best answer hadn't been given, yet.
Is there an
UPDATE
syntax ... without specifying the column names?
You don't need to know any column names except for some unique column(s) to join on (id
in the example). Works reliably for any possible corner case I can think of.
This is specific to PostgreSQL. I am building dynamic code based on the the information_schema, in particular the table information_schema.columns
, which is defined in the SQL standard and most major RDBMS (except Oracle) have it. But a DO
statement with PL/pgSQL code executing dynamic SQL is totally non-standard PostgreSQL syntax.
DO
$do$
BEGIN
EXECUTE (
SELECT
'UPDATE b
SET (' || string_agg( quote_ident(column_name), ',') || ')
= (' || string_agg('a.' || quote_ident(column_name), ',') || ')
FROM a
WHERE b.id = 123
AND a.id = b.id'
FROM information_schema.columns
WHERE table_name = 'a' -- table name, case sensitive
AND table_schema = 'public' -- schema name, case sensitive
AND column_name <> 'id' -- all columns except id
);
END
$do$;
Assuming a matching column in b
for every column in a
, but not the other way round. b
can have additional columns.
WHERE b.id = 123
is optional, to update a selected row.
SQL Fiddle.
Related answers with more explanation:
You still need to know the list of column names that both tables share. With a syntax shortcut for updating multiple columns - shorter than what other answers suggested so far in any case.
UPDATE b
SET ( column1, column2, column3)
= (a.column1, a.column2, a.column3)
FROM a
WHERE b.id = 123 -- optional, to update only selected row
AND a.id = b.id;
SQL Fiddle.
This syntax was introduced with Postgres 8.2 in 2006, long before the question was asked. Details in the manual.
Related:
B
If all columns of A
are defined NOT NULL
(but not necessarily B
),
and you know the column names of B
(but not necessarily A
).
UPDATE b
SET (column1, column2, column3, column4)
= (COALESCE(ab.column1, b.column1)
, COALESCE(ab.column2, b.column2)
, COALESCE(ab.column3, b.column3)
, COALESCE(ab.column4, b.column4)
)
FROM (
SELECT *
FROM a
NATURAL LEFT JOIN b -- append missing columns
WHERE b.id IS NULL -- only if anything actually changes
AND a.id = 123 -- optional, to update only selected row
) ab
WHERE b.id = ab.id;
The NATURAL LEFT JOIN
joins a row from b
where all columns of the same name hold same values. We don't need an update in this case (nothing changes) and can eliminate those rows early in the process (WHERE b.id IS NULL
).
We still need to find a matching row, so b.id = ab.id
in the outer query.
db<>fiddle here
Old sqlfiddle.
This is standard SQL except for the FROM
clause.
It works no matter which of the columns are actually present in A
, but the query cannot distinguish between actual NULL values and missing columns in A
, so it is only reliable if all columns in A
are defined NOT NULL
.
There are multiple possible variations, depending on what you know about both tables.
I have been working with IBM DB2 database for more then decade and now trying to learn PostgreSQL.
It works on PostgreSQL 9.3.4, but does not work on DB2 10.5:
UPDATE B SET
COLUMN1 = A.COLUMN1,
COLUMN2 = A.COLUMN2,
COLUMN3 = A.COLUMN3
FROM A
WHERE A.ID = B.ID
Note: Main problem is FROM cause that is not supported in DB2 and also not in ANSI SQL.
It works on DB2 10.5, but does NOT work on PostgreSQL 9.3.4:
UPDATE B SET
(COLUMN1, COLUMN2, COLUMN3) =
(SELECT COLUMN1, COLUMN2, COLUMN3 FROM A WHERE ID = B.ID)
FINALLY! It works on both PostgreSQL 9.3.4 and DB2 10.5:
UPDATE B SET
COLUMN1 = (SELECT COLUMN1 FROM A WHERE ID = B.ID),
COLUMN2 = (SELECT COLUMN2 FROM A WHERE ID = B.ID),
COLUMN3 = (SELECT COLUMN3 FROM A WHERE ID = B.ID)
This is a great help. The code
UPDATE tbl_b b
SET ( column1, column2, column3)
= (a.column1, a.column2, a.column3)
FROM tbl_a a
WHERE b.id = 1
AND a.id = b.id;
works perfectly.
noted that you need a bracket "" in
From "tbl_a" a
to make it work.
Not necessarily what you asked, but maybe using postgres inheritance might help?
CREATE TABLE A (
ID int,
column1 text,
column2 text,
column3 text
);
CREATE TABLE B (
column4 text
) INHERITS (A);
This avoids the need to update B.
But be sure to read all the details.
Otherwise, what you ask for is not considered a good practice - dynamic stuff such as views with SELECT * ...
are discouraged (as such slight convenience might break more things than help things), and what you ask for would be equivalent for the UPDATE ... SET
command.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With