I need to sort an std::map
by value rather than by key. Is there an easy way to do it?
I got one solution from the follwing thread:
std::map sort by data?
Is there a better solution?
map<long, double> testMap; // some code to generate the values in the map. sort(testMap.begin(), testMap.end()); // is there any function like this to sort the map?
Use std::vector and std::sort Algorithm to Sort Map Elements by Value in C++ std::map is an associative container that can store key-value pairs with unique keys, and the latter are used to sort the elements in the object automatically.
Solution: The idea is to store the entry set in a list and sort the list on the basis of values. Then fetch values and keys from the list and put them in a new hashmap. Thus, a new hashmap is sorted according to values.
Step 1: Create a TreeMap in java with a custom comparator. Step 2: Comparator should compare based on values and then based on the keys. Step 3: Put all key-value pairs from the hashmap into the treemap. Step 4: return the treemap.
Maps are associative containers that store elements in a mapped fashion. Each element has a key value and a mapped value. No two mapped values can have equal key values. By default, a Map in C++ is sorted in increasing order based on its key.
Even though correct answers have already been posted, I thought I'd add a demo of how you can do this cleanly:
template<typename A, typename B> std::pair<B,A> flip_pair(const std::pair<A,B> &p) { return std::pair<B,A>(p.second, p.first); } template<typename A, typename B> std::multimap<B,A> flip_map(const std::map<A,B> &src) { std::multimap<B,A> dst; std::transform(src.begin(), src.end(), std::inserter(dst, dst.begin()), flip_pair<A,B>); return dst; } int main(void) { std::map<int, double> src; ... std::multimap<double, int> dst = flip_map(src); // dst is now sorted by what used to be the value in src! }
Generic Associative Source (requires C++11)
If you're using an alternate to std::map
for the source associative container (such as std::unordered_map
), you could code a separate overload, but in the end the action is still the same, so a generalized associative container using variadic templates can be used for either mapping construct:
// flips an associative container of A,B pairs to B,A pairs template<typename A, typename B, template<class,class,class...> class M, class... Args> std::multimap<B,A> flip_map(const M<A,B,Args...> &src) { std::multimap<B,A> dst; std::transform(src.begin(), src.end(), std::inserter(dst, dst.begin()), flip_pair<A,B>); return dst; }
This will work for both std::map
and std::unordered_map
as the source of the flip.
I needed something similar, but the flipped map wouldn't work for me. I just copied out my map (freq below) into a vector of pairs, then sorted the pairs however I wanted.
std::vector<std::pair<int, int>> pairs; for (auto itr = freq.begin(); itr != freq.end(); ++itr) pairs.push_back(*itr); sort(pairs.begin(), pairs.end(), [=](std::pair<int, int>& a, std::pair<int, int>& b) { return a.second < b.second; } );
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With