I try to run prokka using snakemake and rule all. In the latter I define all output folders which will be produced by prokka to write the results. Prokka requires a folder to be supplied as an output rather than a file.
A simplified version of what I have is here:
PATIENTID_ls = range(2)
rule all:
input:
expand("results_{subjectID}_outputfolder",subjectID=PATIENTID_ls),
rule prokka:
input:
"contigs/subject_{subjectID}/contigs.fasta",
output:
"results/subject_{subjectID}_outputfolder",
shell:
"prokka --cpus 1 --proteins ../GCF_000009645.1_ASM964v1_genomic.gbff --outdir {output} --prefix contigs500_anno9ref {input} "
When running:
$snakemake -p
Building DAG of jobs...
MissingInputException in line 2 of Snakefile:
Missing input files for rule all:
results_1_outputfolder
results_0_outputfolder
It works however when specifying the output explicitly:
snakemake -p results/subject_1_outputfolder
I am sure that is noob mistake on my side, but after hours of playing around I could not solve the issue. Help is highly appreciated. Thank you
Your example has some issues as your rule all
output files do not match your rule prokka
output file.
However, one way to implement what you want to do is to use params
to specify the output directory and use that as argument to the flag --outdir {params.outdir}
.
A similar example is shown below:
PATIENTID_ls = [1,2]
PREFIX = "contigs500_anno9ref"
rule all:
input:
expand("results_{subjectID}_outputfolder/{prefix}.gff",subjectID=PATIENTID_ls, prefix=PREFIX),
rule prokka:
input:
"contigs/contigs.fasta",
params:
outdir= "results_{subjectID}_outputfolder",
prefix= PREFIX,
output:
"results_{subjectID}_outputfolder/{prefix}.gff",
shell:
"echo '{params.prefix}' > {params.outdir}/{PREFIX}.gff"
You still should specify a file as an output in rule prokka
and in rule all
. Based on the example on the prokka repo the output file is essentially {outdir}/{prefix}.gff
. You can specify that as the output to both rule all
and rule prokka
without ever directly using it while invoking the command.
Alternatively even though there does not seem to be a reason for it, you could use a mock file to signify completion of the rule.
An example would be:
PATIENTID_ls = [1,2]
rule all:
input:
expand("results_{subjectID}_outputfolder/mockfile.txt",subjectID=PATIENTID_ls),
rule prokka:
input:
"contigs/contigs.fasta",
params:
outdir= "results_{subjectID}_outputfolder",
prefix= "contigs500_anno9ref",
output:
"results_{subjectID}_outputfolder/mockfile.txt",
shell:
"echo '{params.prefix}' && touch {params.outdir}/mockfile.txt"
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With