When the function requires a char*, can you pass in a shared_ptr?
I'm reading in a whole text file (length = 100), and want to store the char's into a char[] array. The naive way I used was this:
ifstream dictFile(fileName);
size_t fileLength = 100;
char* readInBuffer(new char[fileLength]);
dictFile.read(readInBuffer, fileLength);
//processing readInBuffuer..............
delete[] readInBuffer;
dictFile.close();
Of course there is memory leak if an exception is thrown before the delete[] statement. I'm wondering if I can use shared_ptr readInBuffer(new char[fileLength]); But the function prototype
read ( char* s, streamsize n )
won't accept a smart pointer as input? Any tricks?
Edit: I'm trying to write something like this:
shared_ptr<char[]> readInBuffer(new char[fileLength]);
dictFile.read(readInBuffer.get(), fileLength);
But it won't compile.
BIG FAT WARNING: creating a std::shared_ptr<char>
that points to an array provokes undefined behaviour, because the smart pointer will delete
the pointer, not delete[]
it. Use a std::shared_ptr<char[]>
instead!
Leaving this here because it might serve as a useful warning. Original answer follows...
The get()
function returns the underlying raw pointer. You already wrote this in your code!
shared_ptr<char[]> readInBuffer(new char[fileLength]);
dictFile.read(readInBuffer.get(), fileLength);
The same result can be achieved with &*readInBuffer
.
Of course, you have to be certain that dictFile.read()
doesn't delete
the pointer, or demons might fly out of your nose.
Rather than using a pointer, you can use a vector instead.
std::vector<char> readInBuffer(fileLength);
dictFile.read(&readInBuffer[0], fileLength);
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With