Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Safely comparing local and universal DateTimes

I just noticed what seems like a ridiculous flaw with DateTime comparison.

DateTime d = DateTime.Now; DateTime dUtc = d.ToUniversalTime();  d == dUtc; // false d.Equals(dUtc); //false DateTime.Compare(d, dUtc) == 0; // false 

It appears that all comparison operations on DateTimes fail to do any type of smart conversion if one is DateTimeKind.Local and one is DateTimeKind.UTC. Is the a better way to reliably compare DateTimes aside from always converting both involved in the comparison to utc time?

like image 921
jdc0589 Avatar asked Aug 03 '11 17:08

jdc0589


People also ask

How do I check if one date is greater than another in C#?

Compare() Method in C# This method is used to compare two instances of DateTime and returns an integer that indicates whether the first instance is earlier than, the same as, or later than the second instance.

How can check date less than current date in C#?

ParseExact(input, "MM/dd/yyyy", CultureInfo. InvariantCulture); int result = DateTime. Compare(dTCurrent, inputDate); The int 'result' would indicate if dTCurrent is less than inputDate (less than 0), same as (0) or greater than (greater than 0).


2 Answers

When you call .Equal or .Compare, internally the value .InternalTicks is compared, which is a ulong without its first two bits. This field is unequal, because it has been adjusted a couple of hours to represent the time in the universal time: when you call ToUniversalTime(), it adjusts the time with an offset of the current system's local timezone settings.

You should see it this way: the DateTime object represents a time in an unnamed timezone, but not a universal time plus timezone. The timezone is either Local (the timezone of your system) or UTC. You might consider this a lack of the DateTime class, but historically it has been implemented as "number of ticks since 1970" and doesn't contain timezone info.

When converting to another UTC, the time is — and should be — adjusted. This is probably why Microsoft chose to use a method as opposed to a property, to emphasize that an action is taken when converting to UTC.

Originally I wrote here that the structs are compared and the flag for System.DateTime.Kind is different. This is not true: it is the amount of ticks that differs:

t1.Ticks == t2.Ticks;       // false t1.Ticks.Equals(t2.Ticks);  // false 

To safely compare two dates, you could convert them to the same kind. If you convert any date to universal time before comparing you'll get the results you're after:

DateTime t1 = DateTime.Now; DateTime t2 = someOtherTime; DateTime.Compare(t1.ToUniversalTime(), t2.ToUniversalTime());  // 0 DateTime.Equals(t1.ToUniversalTime(), t2.ToUniversalTime());  // true 

Converting to UTC time without changing the local time

Instead of converting to UTC (and in the process leaving the time the same, but the number of ticks different), you can also overwrite the DateTimeKind and set it to UTC (which changes the time, because it is now in UTC, but it compares as equal, as the number of ticks is equal).

var t1 = DateTime.Now var t2 = DateTime.SpecifyKind(t1, DateTimeKind.Utc) var areEqual = t1 == t2   // true var stillEqual = t1.Equals(t2) // true 

I guess that DateTime is one of those rare types that can be bitwise unequal, but compare as equal, or can be bitwise equal (the time part) and compare unequal.

Changes in .NET 6

In .NET 6.0, we now have TimeOnly and DateOnly. You can use these to store "just the time of day", of "just the date of the year". Combine these in a struct and you'll have a Date & Time struct without the historical nuisances of the original DateTime.

Alternatives

Working properly with DateTime, TimeZoneInfo, leap seconds, calendars, shifting timezones, durations etc is hard in .NET. I personally prefer NodaTime by Jon Skeet, which gives control back to the programmer in a meaningful an unambiguous way.

This insightful post by Jon Skeet explains in great depth the troubles a programmer can face when trying to circumvent all DateTime issues when just storing everything in UTC.

Background info from the source

If you check the DateTime struct in the .NET source, you'll find a note that explains how originally (in .NET 1.0) the DateTime was just the number of ticks, but that later they added the ability to store whether it was Universal or Local time. If you serialize, however, this info is lost.

This is the note in the source:

    // This value type represents a date and time.  Every DateTime     // object has a private field (Ticks) of type Int64 that stores the     // date and time as the number of 100 nanosecond intervals since     // 12:00 AM January 1, year 1 A.D. in the proleptic Gregorian Calendar.     //     // Starting from V2.0, DateTime also stored some context about its time     // zone in the form of a 3-state value representing Unspecified, Utc or     // Local. This is stored in the two top bits of the 64-bit numeric value     // with the remainder of the bits storing the tick count. This information     // is only used during time zone conversions and is not part of the     // identity of the DateTime. Thus, operations like Compare and Equals     // ignore this state. This is to stay compatible with earlier behavior     // and performance characteristics and to avoid forcing  people into dealing     // with the effects of daylight savings. Note, that this has little effect     // on how the DateTime works except in a context where its specific time     // zone is needed, such as during conversions and some parsing and formatting     // cases. 
like image 130
Abel Avatar answered Sep 22 '22 15:09

Abel


To deal with this, I created my own DateTime object (let's call it SmartDateTime) that contains the DateTime and the TimeZone. I override all operators like == and Compare and convert to UTC before doing the comparison using the original DateTime operators.

like image 39
Ed Bayiates Avatar answered Sep 23 '22 15:09

Ed Bayiates