Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How can I add a type constraint to include anything serializable in a generic method?

My generic method needs to serialize the object passed to it, however just insisting that it implements ISerializable doesn't seem to work. For example, I have a struct returned from a web service (marked with SerializableAttribute) that serializes to xml just fine, but, as expected, the C# compiler complains.

Is there a way I can check the object is serializable before attempting to serialize it, or, better still, a way of using the where keyword to check the object is suitable?

Here's my full method:

public static void Push<T>(string url, T message)         where T : ISerializable {     string xml = SerializeMessage(message);      // Send the message to Amazon SQS     SendMessageRequest sendReq = new SendMessageRequest { QueueUrl = url, MessageBody = xml };     AmazonSQSClient client = new AmazonSQSClient(S3User, S3Pass);     client.SendMessage(sendReq); } 

And SerializeMessage:

private static string SerializeMessage<T>(T message) {     XmlSerializer xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(T));     using (StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter())     {         xmlSerializer.Serialize(stringWriter, message);         return stringWriter.ToString();     } } 

If this isn't possible, what's the best way to perform a check that an object is serializable at runtime?

like image 618
Matt Brindley Avatar asked Jun 03 '09 15:06

Matt Brindley


People also ask

How do you add a generic constraint?

You can specify one or more constraints on the generic type using the where clause after the generic type name. The following example demonstrates a generic class with a constraint to reference types when instantiating the generic class.

What keyword allows you to put constraints on a generic type?

So here is the list of some of the constraints that you can add to the generic classes, using the where keyword: Restrict the generic class to use the type parameter of value or reference type only (as we discussed above). Restrict the type parameter T, to be implementing the specified interface.

Can generic classes be constrained?

Declaring those constraints means you can use the operations and method calls of the constraining type. If your generic class or method uses any operation on the generic members beyond simple assignment or calling any methods not supported by System. Object, you'll apply constraints to the type parameter.

Which of the following generic constraints restricts the generic type parameter to an object of the class?

Value type constraint If we declare the generic class using the following code then we will get a compile-time error if we try to substitute a reference type for the type parameter.


1 Answers

You can't do this totally via generic constraints, but you can do a couple things to help:

1) Put the new() constraint on the generic type (to enable the ability to deserialize and to ensure the XmlSerializer doesn't complain about a lack of default ctor):

where T : new() 

2) On the first line of your method handling the serialization (or constructor or anywhere else you don't have to repeat it over and over), you can perform this check:

if( !typeof(T).IsSerializable && !(typeof(ISerializable).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(T)) ) )     throw new InvalidOperationException("A serializable Type is required"); 

Of course, there's still the possibility of runtime exceptions when trying to serialize a type, but this will cover the most obvious issues.

like image 139
Adam Sills Avatar answered Sep 30 '22 02:09

Adam Sills