I have a file of data fields, which may contain comments, like below:
id, data, data, data
101 a, b, c
102 d, e, f
103 g, h, i // has to do with 101 a, b, c
104 j, k, l
//105 m, n, o
// 106 p, q, r
As you can see in the first comment above, there are direct references to a matching pattern. Now, I want to capture 103 and it's three data fields, but I don't want to capture what's in the comments.
I've tried negative lookbehind to exclude 105 and 106, but I can't come up with a regex to capture both.
(?<!//)(\b\d+\b),\s(data),\s(data),\s(data)
This will capture all but exclude capture of 105, but to specify
(?<!//\s*) or (?<!//.*)
as my attempt to exclude a comment with any whitespace or any characters invalidates my entire regex.
I have a feeling I need a crafty use of an anchor, or I need to wrap what I want in a capture group and make a reference to it (like with $1
) in my lookbehind.
If this is another case of "regular expressions don't support recursion" because it's a regular language (a la automata theory), please point that out.
Is it possible to exclude the comments in 103, and lines 105 and 106, using a regular expression? If so, how?
The easy way out is to replace \s*//.*
with the empty string before you begin.
This will remove all the (single-line) comments from your input and you can go on with a simple expression to match what actually you want.
The alternative would be to use look-ahead instead of look-behind:
^(?!//)(\b\d+\b),\s(data),\s(data),\s(data)
In your case it would even work to just anchor the regex because it is clear that the first thing on a line must be a digit:
^(\b\d+\b),\s(data),\s(data),\s(data)
Some regex engines (the one in .NET, for example), support variable-length look-behinds, your's does not seem to be capable of this, this is why (?<!//\s*)
fails for you.
You could simply anchor the regex to the start of the line:
(?m)^(\d+),\s(\S+),\s(\S+),\s(\S+)
It seems to me you could just anchor the expression at the beginning of the line (to get all the data):
^(\d+),\s(data),\s(data),\s(data)\s*(?://|$)
Or maybe you can use a proper CSV parser which can handle comments.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With