Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Python Simple Swap Function

Tags:

python

swap

I came across this problem when attempting to learn python. Consider the following function:

def swap0(s1, s2):
    assert type(s1) == list and type(s2) == list
    tmp = s1[:]
    s1 = s2[:]
    s2 = tmp
return

s1 = [1]
s2 = [2]
swap0(s1, s2)
print s1, s2

What will s1 and s2 print?

After running the problem, I found that the print statement will print 1 2. It seems that the value of s1 and s2 did not change from the swap0 function. The only explanation that I could think of was because of the line.

tmp = s1[:]

Since s1[:] is a copy, this makes sense that the value of s1 will not change in the function call. However because the parameter of swap0 is (s1, s2), I am not sure if after doing tmp = s1[:]. Anytime I do

s1 = something...

it will be a reference to the copy of s1, instead of s1 itself. Can someone offer a better explanation? Thanks.

like image 529
Rhs Avatar asked Oct 31 '12 20:10

Rhs


4 Answers

It's because it assigns new values to s1 and s2 inside the swap0 function. These assignments do not propagate outside the function. You'll see that it works if you just copy and paste the function body in the place of the function call.

You can work around this by modifying the objects referenced by the arguments, rather than the arguments themselves:

def swap0(s1, s2):
    assert type(s1) == list and type(s2) == list
    tmp = s1[:]
    s1[:] = s2
    s2[:] = tmp

However, the easier and better way to do a swap in Python is simply:

s1, s2 = s2, s1

This, too, will only swap those particular references to the lists, but not the list contents themselves.

like image 193
Thomas Avatar answered Oct 18 '22 03:10

Thomas


As it is, your final print will print out the original values of s1 and s2. This is because you're only swapping them within the scope of the function. Doing so will not affect their values outside the function (i.e. after their values after the function has been called)

If they are mutable types (list, set, dict, etc), then you could modify them in-place inside swap. However, that restricts swap to work only on mutable types.

You are therefore better off returning the inputs in reversed order:

def swap(s1, s2):
    return s2, s1

s1 = 'a'
s2 = 'b'
s1, s2 = swap(s1, s2)
print s1, s2 # prints 'b a'

Of course, you could do this all in one line as follows:

s1, s2 = s2, s1

Cheers!

like image 37
inspectorG4dget Avatar answered Oct 18 '22 04:10

inspectorG4dget


The other answers explain what's going wrong. Here's a version that does what you want:

def swap(s1, s2):
    assert isinstance(s1, list) and isinstance(s2, list)
    s1[:], s2[:] = s2[:], s1[:]

See also: isinstance vs. type

like image 6
Zero Piraeus Avatar answered Oct 18 '22 04:10

Zero Piraeus


Inside the function, you're rebinding local variables s1 and s2 with the values on the right hand side (which are also local since you're using slices to make copies). Even if you change the contents of those local variables, you won't change the contents of the lists in the calling scope because they no longer refer to the same lists.

like image 4
mgilson Avatar answered Oct 18 '22 03:10

mgilson