Is there a general problem with printing a data.frame
when it has a list-column of S4 objects? Or am I just unlucky?
I ran across this with objects from the git2r
package but maintainer Stefan Widgren points out this example from Matrix
as well. I note that the object can be printed if sent through dplyr::tbl_df()
. I accept that the printing doesn't provide much info on S4 objects; all I ask is no error.
UPDATED with slightly higher ambition: can the data.frame
-like quality be preserved?
library(Matrix)
library(dplyr)
m <- new("dgCMatrix")
isS4(m)
#> [1] TRUE
df <- data.frame(id = 1:2)
df$matrices <- list(m, m)
df
#> Error in prettyNum(.Internal(format(x, trim, digits, nsmall, width, 3L, : first argument must be atomic
tbl_df(df)
#> Source: local data frame [2 x 2]
#>
#> id
#> (int)
#> 1 1
#> 2 2
#> Variables not shown: matrices (list).
## force dplyr to show the tricky column
tbl_df(select(df, matrices))
#> Source: local data frame [2 x 1]
#>
#> matrices
#> (list)
#> 1 <S4:dgCMatrix, CsparseMatrix, dsparseMatrix, generalMatrix, dCsparseMatrix,
#> 2 <S4:dgCMatrix, CsparseMatrix, dsparseMatrix, generalMatrix, dCsparseMatrix,
## rawr points out that this does not error ... but loses the df quality
print.default(df)
#> $id
#> [1] 1 2
#>
#> $matrices
#> $matrices[[1]]
#> 0 x 0 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
#> <0 x 0 matrix>
#>
#> $matrices[[2]]
#> 0 x 0 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
#> <0 x 0 matrix>
#>
#>
#> attr(,"class")
#> [1] "data.frame"
Another option (with potentially greater consequences than desired) is:
library(Matrix)
format.list <- function(x, ...) { rep(class(x[[1]]), length(x)) }
m <- new("dgCMatrix")
df <- data.frame(id = 1:2)
df$matrices <- list(m, m)
df
## id matrices
## 1 1 dgCMatrix
## 2 2 dgCMatrix
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With