When we use a transaction in Redis, it basically pipelines all the commands within the transaction. And when EXEC is fired, then all the commands are executed together, thus always maintaining the atomicity of multiple commands.
Isn't this same as pipelining?
How are pipelining and transaction different? Also, why does not the single threaded nature of Redis suffice? Why do we explicitly need pipelining/transaction?
Redis pipelining is a technique for improving performance by issuing multiple commands at once without waiting for the response to each individual command. Pipelining is supported by most Redis clients.
Redis Transactions allow the execution of a group of commands in a single step, they are centered around the commands MULTI , EXEC , DISCARD and WATCH . Redis Transactions make two important guarantees: All the commands in a transaction are serialized and executed sequentially.
Advantages of Redis Pipelining : The main advantage of Redis pipelining is to boosting up protocol performance. It improves Redis performance because of multiple commands simultaneous execution.
In most cases, limiting the size of the pipeline to 100-1000 operations gives the best results. But, you can do a little benchmark research that includes typical requests that you send.
Pipelining is primarily a network optimization. It essentially means the client buffers up a bunch of commands and ships them to the server in one go. The commands are not guaranteed to be executed in a transaction. The benefit here is saving network round trip time for every command.
Redis is single threaded so an individual command is always atomic, but two given commands from different clients can execute in sequence, alternating between them for example.
Multi/exec, however, ensures no other clients are executing commands in between the commands in the multi/exec sequence.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With