Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

PDB files for production app and the "Optimize code" flag

When should I include PDB files for a production release? Should I use the Optimize code flag and how would that affect the information I get from an exception?

If there is a noticeable performance benefit I would want to use the optimizations but if not I'd rather have accurate debugging info. What is typically done for a production app?

like image 803
JC. Avatar asked Sep 03 '08 14:09

JC.


People also ask

Should you deploy PDB files to production?

Answers. PDBs are required for debugging and store debugging information and they are created when you compile the application. Unless you plan to debug in production there is no need and you should aim to deploy in release mode.

Do PDB files affect performance?

The executive summary answer: no, generating PDB files will have no impact on performance whatsoever.


3 Answers

When you want to see source filenames and line numbers in your stacktraces, generate PDBs using the pdb-only option. Optimization is separate from PDB generation, i.e. you can optimize and generate PDBs without a performance hit.

From the C# Language Reference

If you use /debug:full, be aware that there is some impact on the speed and size of JIT optimized code and a small impact on code quality with /debug:full. We recommend /debug:pdbonly or no PDB for generating release code.

like image 122
Duncan Smart Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 13:09

Duncan Smart


To answer your first question, you only need to include PDBs for a production release if you need line numbers for your exception reports.

To answer your second question, using the "Optimise" flag with PDBs means that any stack "collapse" will be reflected in the stack trace. I'm not sure whether the actual line number reported can be wrong - this needs more investigation.

To answer your third question, you can have the best of both worlds with a rather neat trick. The major differences between the default debug build and default release build are that when doing a default release build, optimization is turned on and debug symbols are not emitted. So, in four steps:

  1. Change your release config to emit debug symbols. This has virtually no effect on the performance of your app, and is very useful if (when?) you need to debug a release build of your app.

  2. Compile using your new release build config, i.e. with debug symbols and with optimization. Note that 99% of code optimization is done by the JIT compiler, not the language compiler.

  3. Create a text file in your app's folder called xxxx.exe.ini (or dll or whatever), where xxxx is the name of your executable. This text file should initially look like:

    [.NET Framework Debugging Control]
    GenerateTrackingInfo=0
    AllowOptimize=1
    
  4. With these settings, your app runs at full speed. When you want to debug your app by turning on debug tracking and possibly turning off (CIL) code optimization, just use the following settings:

    [.NET Framework Debugging Control]
    GenerateTrackingInfo=1
    AllowOptimize=0 
    

EDIT According to cateye's comment, this can also work in a hosted environment such as ASP.NET.

like image 33
HTTP 410 Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 13:09

HTTP 410


There is no need to include them in your distribution, but you should definitely be building them and keeping them. Otherwise debugging a crash dump is practically impossible.

I would also turn on optimizations. Whilst it does make debugging more difficult the performance gains are usually very non-trivial depending on the nature of the application. We easily see over 10x performance on release vs debug builds for some algorithms.

like image 38
Rob Walker Avatar answered Sep 21 '22 13:09

Rob Walker