I would like to create a function that takes a variable number of template arguments. Later with these arguments the function should pass their position like this:
template<typename R, typename Args...>
R myFunction(Data &data, void *function) {
auto f = (R (*)(Args...))function;
return f(read<Args1>(data, 1), read<Args2>(data, 2), ...);// <-- This is the problem
}
The given code is of course not compilable. Is there any way to fix it? Is there a way to do it without variadic templates without too much code duplication?
Yes, that is possible:
// we need a compile-time helper to generate indices
template< std::size_t... Ns >
struct indices
{
typedef indices< Ns..., sizeof...( Ns ) > next;
};
template< std::size_t N >
struct make_indices
{
typedef typename make_indices< N - 1 >::type::next type;
};
template<>
struct make_indices< 0 >
{
typedef indices<> type;
};
With these helpers, you need one forwarder for your function like this:
template<typename R, typename... Args, std::size_t... Ns>
R myFunctionImpl(void *Data, void *function, indices<Ns...> ) {
auto f = (R (*)(Args...))function;
return f(read<Args>(Data, Ns + 1)...);// +1 because indices is zero-based
}
template<typename R, typename... Args>
R myFunction(void *Data, void *function) {
return myFunctionImpl< R, Args... >( Data, function, typename make_indices<sizeof...(Args)>::type() );
}
EDIT: How does it work? First, we determine the size of the argument pack Args
through sizeof...
. make_indices<N>::type
then expands into indices<0,1,2,...,N-1>
. It is given as an additional parameter to the implementation function (from the forwarder who just creates a dummy instance), hence argument deduction kicks in on the implementation function's side and puts the generated indices into the argument pack Ns
.
The implementation function now has two argument packs with the same size, namely Args
and Ns
. When expanded through the ellipsis ...
, the ellipsis expands the whole expression that it's applied to and it expands all parameter packs in parallel! In the above example that expression is read<Args>(Data, Ns+1)
, which nicely expands into the OPs pseudo-code.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With