I'm using a pandas DataFrame in which one column contains numpy arrays. When trying to sum that column via aggregation I get an error stating 'Must produce aggregated value'.
e.g.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
DF = pd.DataFrame([[1,np.array([10,20,30])],
[1,np.array([40,50,60])],
[2,np.array([20,30,40])],], columns=['category','arraydata'])
This works the way I would expect it to:
DF.groupby('category').agg(sum)
output:
arraydata
category 1 [50 70 90]
2 [20 30 40]
However, since my real data frame has multiple numeric columns, arraydata is not chosen as the default column to aggregate on, and I have to select it manually. Here is one approach I tried:
g=DF.groupby('category')
g.agg({'arraydata':sum})
Here is another:
g=DF.groupby('category')
g['arraydata'].agg(sum)
Both give the same output:
Exception: must produce aggregated value
However if I have a column that uses numeric rather than array data, it works fine. I can work around this, but it's confusing and I'm wondering if this is a bug, or if I'm doing something wrong. I feel like the use of arrays here might be a bit of an edge case and indeed wasn't sure if they were supported. Ideas?
Thanks
Test whether all array elements along a given axis evaluate to True. Input array or object that can be converted to an array. Axis or axes along which a logical AND reduction is performed.
What is the GroupBy function? Pandas' GroupBy is a powerful and versatile function in Python. It allows you to split your data into separate groups to perform computations for better analysis.
values returns a numpy array with the underlying data of the DataFrame, without any index or columns names.
One, perhaps more clunky way to do it would be to iterate over the GroupBy
object (it generates (grouping_value, df_subgroup)
tuples. For example, to achieve what you want here, you could do:
grouped = DF.groupby("category")
aggregate = list((k, v["arraydata"].sum()) for k, v in grouped)
new_df = pd.DataFrame(aggregate, columns=["category", "arraydata"]).set_index("category")
This is very similar to what pandas is doing under the hood anyways [groupby, then do some aggregation, then merge back in], so you aren't really losing out on much.
The problem here is that pandas is checking explicitly that the output not be an ndarray
because it wants to intelligently reshape your array, as you can see in this snippet from _aggregate_named
where the error occurs.
def _aggregate_named(self, func, *args, **kwargs):
result = {}
for name, group in self:
group.name = name
output = func(group, *args, **kwargs)
if isinstance(output, np.ndarray):
raise Exception('Must produce aggregated value')
result[name] = self._try_cast(output, group)
return result
My guess is that this happens because groupby
is explicitly set up to try to intelligently put back together a DataFrame with the same indexes and everything aligned nicely. Since it's rare to have nested arrays in a DataFrame like that, it checks for ndarrays to make sure that you are actually using an aggregate function. In my gut, this feels like a job for Panel
, but I'm not sure how to transform it perfectly. As an aside, you can sidestep this problem by converting your output to a list, like this:
DF.groupby("category").agg({"arraydata": lambda x: list(x.sum())})
Pandas doesn't complain, because now you have an array of Python objects. [but this is really just cheating around the typecheck]. And if you want to convert back to array, just apply np.array
to it.
result = DF.groupby("category").agg({"arraydata": lambda x: list(x.sum())})
result["arraydata"] = result["arraydata"].apply(np.array)
How you want to resolve this issue really depends on why you have columns of ndarray
and whether you want to aggregate anything else at the same time. That said, you can always iterate over GroupBy
like I've shown above.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With