I'm getting "System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object." on my release build. I have created a sample application that imitates what's there in my production code.
void Abc::LogService::Log(String^ message)
{
try
{
int ret = DoProcessing(message);
Exception^ ex;
if (ret == 0)
{
ex = gcnew ArgumentException("Processing done.");
}
else
{
ex = gcnew ArgumentNullException("message", "Null args");
}
throw ex;
}
finally
{
//do someother thing.
}
}
With the above code, it reports the exception line to be:
at Abc.LogService.Log(String message) in logservice.cpp:line 19
which corresponds to the throw ex;
statement in the code.
The MSIL in the release build for this function looks as:
.method public hidebysig instance void Log(string message) cil managed
{
// Code size 46 (0x2e)
.maxstack 4
.locals ([0] class [mscorlib]System.Exception V_0,
[1] class [mscorlib]System.Exception ex)
.try
{
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: ldarg.1
IL_0002: call instance int32 Abc.LogService::DoProcessing(string)
IL_0007: ldnull
IL_0008: stloc.1
IL_0009: brtrue.s IL_0018
IL_000b: ldstr "Processing done."
IL_0010: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.ArgumentException::.ctor(string)
IL_0015: stloc.0
IL_0016: br.s IL_0028
IL_0018: ldstr "message"
IL_001d: ldstr "Null args"
IL_0022: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.ArgumentNullException::.ctor(string,
string)
IL_0027: stloc.0
IL_0028: ldloc.1
IL_0029: throw
IL_002a: leave.s IL_002d
} // end .try
finally
{
IL_002c: endfinally
} // end handler
IL_002d: ret
} // end of method LogService::Log
From the MSIL code, it shows that at statement IL_0028, it loads up a null value and calls the throw in the subsequent statement. The strange part is this happens only if I have the try-finally block. Debug build of the above code works fine.
Does this sound as a bug in VS2015 v140 toolkit?
Yes, this is an optimizer bug. Pretty unusual, first one I've seen for C++/CLI, a language where the jitter is supposed to do the heavy lifting. It appears to be tripped by declaring the ex
variable inside the try-block, getting it to choke on the initialization guarantee. Looks like a flow analysis bug.
Short from compiling with /Od, one workaround is to move the variable out of the try block
void Log(String^ message) {
Exception^ ex;
try {
// etc...
}
Also producing much better MSIL, completely eliminating the variable:
.method public hidebysig instance void Log(string message) cil managed
{
// Code size 41 (0x29)
.maxstack 4
.try
{
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: ldarg.1
IL_0002: call instance int32 Test::DoProcessing(string)
IL_0007: brtrue.s IL_0015
IL_0009: ldstr "Processing done."
IL_000e: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.ArgumentException::.ctor(string)
IL_0013: br.s IL_0024
IL_0015: ldstr "message"
IL_001a: ldstr "Null args"
IL_001f: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.ArgumentNullException::.ctor(string,
string)
IL_0024: throw
IL_0025: leave.s IL_0028
} // end .try
finally
{
IL_0027: endfinally
} // end handler
IL_0028: ret
} // end of method Test::Log
Optimizer bugs suck, you can report it at connect.microsoft.com
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With