The Apple docs for CAMetalLayer
state that the property presentsWithTransaction
is:
A Boolean value that determines whether the layer presents its content using a Core Animation transaction
As I'm using UIKit to drive some metal animations (similar to the method Apple suggests for OpenGL in this WWDC 2012 session), I'm assuming this is the right time to enable it. I have a Metal "background" view, overlayed with some UIKit components (which also animate) and so this sounds very much like the applicable use-case:
By default [
.presentsWithTransaction
] is false:CAMetalLayer
displays the output of a rendering pass to the display as quickly as possible and asynchronously to any Core Animation transactions. However, if your game or app combines Metal and Core Animation content, it's not guaranteed that your Metal content will arrive in the same frame as your Core Animation content. This could be an issue if, for example, your app draws UIKit content (such as labels with a target position and time) over the top of yourCAMetalLayer
and the two domains need to be synchronized.
Certainly, without that setting enabled, scrolling appears jerky. With presentsWithTransaction
enabled I'm having some limited success but neither of two routes I've tried with the setting enabled are perfect.
The first method I've tried follows the instructions within the docs for presentsWithTransaction
. So, within my MTKViewDelegate
I have the following method:
func draw(in view: MTKView) {
guard
let commandBuffer = commandQueue.makeCommandBuffer(),
let drawable = view.currentDrawable
else { return }
updateState(device: device, library: library) // update positions, etc.
render(with: commandBuffer, in: view) // drawing code
commandBuffer.commit()
commandBuffer.waitUntilScheduled()
drawable.present()
}
This mostly works fine – but so does leaving the setting off entirely. It has a tendency to de-synchronise at certain points, causing a characteristic shudder driving a scrolling animation via a UIScrollView
for example. The whole idea of presentsWithTransaction
is to avoid exactly this, so perhaps I'm doing something wrong here.
The second method makes use of addScheduledHandler
on the command buffer:
func draw(in view: MTKView) {
guard
let commandBuffer = commandQueue.makeCommandBuffer(),
let drawable = view.currentDrawable
else { return }
updateState(device: device, library: library) // update positions, etc.
render(with: commandBuffer, in: view) // drawing code
commandBuffer.addScheduledHandler { _ in
DispatchQueue.main.async { drawable.present() }
}
commandBuffer.commit()
}
This method appears to stay in sync, but causes some horrendous CPU hangs (2 secs or more), especially when the app becomes active after being in the background.
Is there any way to get the best of both worlds?
Edit: 9-Dec-2018: Whilst the first method described above does seem to be preferential, it does still result in frequent de-synchronisation if there is a spike in CPU usage on the main thread – which is unavoidable in most situations.
You can tell when this happens as the draw loop becomes starved of drawables. This causes a knock-on effect, which means the drawable for the next frame is delayed also. In the Metal Instruments panel, this results in a series of 'thread blocked waiting for next drawable' warnings.
With the design above, as Metal is blocked waiting for a drawable – so is the main thread. Now touch events become delayed, resulting in a distinctive stuttering pattern for a pan gesture – even though the app is still running theoretically at a full 60fps, the blocking seems to affect the cadence at which touch events are reported – resulting in the judder effect.
A subsequent CPU spike can knock things back into sequence and the app will begin performing as normal.
Edit: 10-Dec-2018: And here's a small example project that demonstrates the issue. Create a new Xcode project copy and paste the contents of the two swift files (add a new file for the metal shader file) and run on device:
https://gist.github.com/tcldr/ee7640ccd97e5d8810af4c34cf960284
Edit 9-Dec-2018: I'm removing the accepted answer designation from this answer as this bug still appears to be at large. Whilst the below makes the bug less likely to occur, it still does occur. More info in the original question.
Original answer: This seems to work for me:
func draw(in view: MTKView) {
updateState() // update positions, etc.
guard let commandBuffer = commandQueue.makeCommandBuffer() else { return }
autoreleasepool { render(with: commandBuffer, in: view) } // drawing code
commandBuffer.commit()
commandBuffer.waitUntilScheduled()
view.currentDrawable?.present()
}
.presentsWithTransaction
on MTKView
is also set to true
The idea is to wait until the last possible moment to call currentDrawable
which is suggested somewhere in the docs, but I can't remember where now. At a minimum, I believe it should be called after .waitUntilScheduled()
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With