Im trying to create 2 docker containers and run them in a way they can communicate with each other through a port in localhost. I have created 2 python files as sender and receiver. When Im running them without docker they communicate nicely. But with docker they are not running properly.
#!/usr/bin/python
# -*- encoding: utf-8 -*-
import socket
import time
import sys
print sys.argv[1]
print sys.argv[2]
for i in range(1,10):
time.sleep(2)
data = "My parameters that I want to share with the server on ith iteration %d" % (i)
print "sedning data: %d" % (i)
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
sock.connect((sys.argv[1], int(sys.argv[2])))
sock.sendall(data)
sock.close()
FROM ubuntu
RUN \
apt-get update && \
apt-get install -y python python-dev python-pip python-virtualenv && \
rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
ADD script.py /root/script.py
CMD python -u /root/script.py $SEND_HOST $SEND_PORT
#!/usr/bin/python
# -*- encoding: utf-8 -*-
import socket
import sys
print sys.argv[1]
print sys.argv[2]
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.bind((sys.argv[1], int(sys.argv[2])))
s.listen(3)
while True:
conn, addr = s.accept()
data = conn.recv(1024)
conn.close()
print "received data from sender: %s" % (data)
FROM ubuntu
RUN \
apt-get update && \
apt-get install -y python python-dev python-pip python-virtualenv && \
rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
ADD script.py /root/script.py
CMD python -u /root/script.py $LISTEN_HOST $LISTEN_PORT
Run command for Receiver
docker run --name="testListen" -p 5555:5555 --env LISTEN_HOST="localhost" --env LISTEN_PORT="5555" docker.io/ayonnayihan/sample-sendr-rcv-test:receiver0.1
Run command for Sender
docker run --name="testTalk" --env SEND_HOST="localhost" --env SEND_PORT="5555" docker.io/ayonnayihan/sample-sendr-rcv-test:sender0.1
Before running the containers I made sure that both images are built. Can anyone tell why its not running properly?
Here is the simple python running command that works just fine without docker:
on receiver python script.py localhost 5555
on sender python script.py localhost 5555
I think you have 3 options here to get this working:
Create a docker network to connect the hosts:
docker network create --driver bridge sample-sendr-rcv-test
docker run --name="testListen" --env LISTEN_HOST="0.0.0.0" --env LISTEN_PORT="5555" --network=sample-sendr-rcv-test -d docker.io/ayonnayihan/sample-sendr-rcv-test:receiver0.1
docker run --name="testTalk" --env SEND_HOST="testListen" --env SEND_PORT="5555" --network=sample-sendr-rcv-test -d docker.io/ayonnayihan/sample-sendr-rcv-test:sender0.1
Use docker-compose with a docker-compose.yml
like:
version: '2'
services:
sender:
image: docker.io/ayonnayihan/sample-sendr-rcv-test:sender0.1
# build: sender
environment:
SEND_HOST: receiver
SEND_PORT: 5555
receiver:
image: docker.io/ayonnayihan/sample-sendr-rcv-test:receiver0.1
# build: receiver
environment:
LISTEN_HOST: '0.0.0.0'
LISTEN_PORT: 5555
Use host networking:
docker run --name="testListen" --env LISTEN_HOST="127.0.0.1" --env LISTEN_PORT="5555" --net=host -d docker.io/ayonnayihan/sample-sendr-rcv-test:receiver0.1
docker run --name="testTalk" --env SEND_HOST="localhost" --env SEND_PORT="5555" --net=host -d docker.io/ayonnayihan/sample-sendr-rcv-test:sender0.1
The third option is the most similar to what you are currently doing but I would not recommend it for reasons explained below. Either of the other options will work but may not be worth learning docker-compose if you are just starting with docker.
The reason you are having an issue is that the containers each have their own idea of 'localhost' because they are in a different network namespace. This means that 'localhost' on your 'testTalk' container does not resolve to the host where your listener is running. When you use --net=host
(option 3 above) you are removing the separate namespace for the containers, thus removing some of the security benefits of using docker.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With