Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

LINQ to SQL vs ADO.NET - which is faster?

Since LINQ to SQL basically is a layer on top of ADO.NET it requires some translation. Does this mean that using ADO.NET directly is faster than LINQ? Or is the difference so small that it is irrelevant?

like image 390
Linora Avatar asked Jan 19 '10 10:01

Linora


People also ask

Which is faster LINQ or SQL?

More importantly: when it comes to querying databases, LINQ is in most cases a significantly more productive querying language than SQL. Compared to SQL, LINQ is simpler, tidier, and higher-level.

Which is faster ADO.NET or Entity Framework?

Entity framework is ORM Model, which used LINQ to access database, and code is autogenerated whereas Ado.net code is larger than Entity Framework. Ado.net is faster than Entity Framework.

Why is ADO.NET faster?

Because ADO.NET always establishes the connection directly to the database. That's why it provides much better performance compared to the Entity Framework. It is because, in Entity Framework, the entity first translates the LINQ queries to SQL and then it processes the query to perform database operations.

Which is better Entity Framework or LINQ to SQL?

LINQ to SQL allow you to query and modify SQL Server database by using LINQ syntax. Entity framework is a great ORM shipped by Microsoft which allow you to query and modify RDBMS like SQL Server, Oracle, DB2 and MySQL etc. by using LINQ syntax. Today, EF is widely used by each and every .


1 Answers

It does mean that ADO.NET is faster. It also gives you heaps of more freedom to optimize your SQL queries (well technically, you could use LINQ to SQL with stored procedures only, but you'd miss out on the whole point).

The fact is that if you really really really need to optimize for best performance, then nobody really recommends using an OR/M. There are heaps of considerations with OR/M:s, performance-wise. But a lot of sites do not really need to optimize that much for performance, in much the same way that we can afford programming in .NET rather than assembler, even though that is the same kind of overhead as compared to writing code in a lower level language.

The point of using LINQ to SQL or NHibernate, or really any other OR/M is that (as with the .NET analogy) it'll give you a whole lot of convenience, and it'll save you a lot of time developing, and make refactoring and other later changes a much simpler task.

like image 169
David Hedlund Avatar answered Oct 03 '22 03:10

David Hedlund