Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Json.NET: Deserializing nested dictionaries

When deserializing an object to a Dictionary (JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<IDictionary<string,object>>(json)) nested objects are deserialized to JObjects. Is it possible to force nested objects to be deserialized to Dictionarys?

like image 542
Daniel Avatar asked Jun 20 '11 18:06

Daniel


3 Answers

I found a way to convert all nested objects to Dictionary<string,object> by providing a CustomCreationConverter implementation:

class MyConverter : CustomCreationConverter<IDictionary<string, object>>
{
    public override IDictionary<string, object> Create(Type objectType)
    {
        return new Dictionary<string, object>();
    }

    public override bool CanConvert(Type objectType)
    {
        // in addition to handling IDictionary<string, object>
        // we want to handle the deserialization of dict value
        // which is of type object
        return objectType == typeof(object) || base.CanConvert(objectType);
    }

    public override object ReadJson(JsonReader reader, Type objectType, object existingValue, JsonSerializer serializer)
    {
        if (reader.TokenType == JsonToken.StartObject
            || reader.TokenType == JsonToken.Null)
            return base.ReadJson(reader, objectType, existingValue, serializer);

        // if the next token is not an object
        // then fall back on standard deserializer (strings, numbers etc.)
        return serializer.Deserialize(reader);
    }
}

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        var json = File.ReadAllText(@"c:\test.json");
        var obj = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<IDictionary<string, object>>(
            json, new JsonConverter[] {new MyConverter()});
    }
}

Documentation: CustomCreationConverter with Json.NET

like image 127
AlexD Avatar answered Nov 02 '22 00:11

AlexD


I had a very similar but slightly more complex need when I ran across this Q. At first I thought maybe I could adapt the accepted answer, but that seemed a bit complicated and I ended up taking a different approach. I was attempting to put a modern JSON layer on top of a legacy C++ API. I'll spare you the details of that, and just say the requirements boil down to:

  • JSON objects become Dictionary<string,object>.

  • JSON arrays become List<object>.

  • JSON values become the corresponding primitive CLR values.

  • The objects and arrays can be infinitely nested.

I first deserialize the request string into a Newtonsoft JSON object and then call my method to convert in accordance with the above requirements:

var jsonObject = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(requestString);
var apiRequest = ToApiRequest(jsonObject);
// call the legacy C++ API ...

Here is my method that converts to the structure the API expects:

    private static object ToApiRequest(object requestObject)
    {
        switch (requestObject)
        {
            case JObject jObject: // objects become Dictionary<string,object>
                return ((IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, JToken>>) jObject).ToDictionary(j => j.Key, j => ToApiRequest(j.Value));
            case JArray jArray: // arrays become List<object>
                return jArray.Select(ToApiRequest).ToList();
            case JValue jValue: // values just become the value
                return jValue.Value;
            default: // don't know what to do here
                throw new Exception($"Unsupported type: {requestObject.GetType()}");
        }
    }

I hope that someone can find this approach useful.

like image 28
James R. Avatar answered Nov 02 '22 00:11

James R.


Alternative/Update:

I needed to deserialize a dictionary of dictionaries of Strings and with current Json.NET (5.0) I did not had to create a CustomConverter, I just used (in VB.Net):

JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(Of IDictionary(Of String, IDictionary(Of String, String)))(jsonString)

Or, in C#:

JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<IDictionary<String, IDictionary<String, String>>(jsonString);
like image 2
madth3 Avatar answered Nov 01 '22 23:11

madth3