What is the difference between:
@Entity public class Company { @OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL , fetch = FetchType.LAZY) @JoinColumn(name = "companyIdRef", referencedColumnName = "companyId") private List<Branch> branches; ... }
and
@Entity public class Company { @OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL , fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "companyIdRef") private List<Branch> branches; ... }
The @JoinColumn annotation helps us specify the column we'll use for joining an entity association or element collection. On the other hand, the mappedBy attribute is used to define the referencing side (non-owning side) of the relationship.
The purpose of the MappedBy parameter is to instruct JPA: Do NOT create another join table as the relationship is already being mapped by the opposite entity of this relationship.
JPA JAVA EE. @JoinColumn is used to specify a column for joining an entity association or element collection. This annotation indicates that the enclosing entity is the owner of the relationship and the corresponding table has a foreign key column which references to the table of the non-owning side.
Annotation Type JoinColumn. Specifies a column for joining an entity association or element collection. If the JoinColumn annotation itself is defaulted, a single join column is assumed and the default values apply. (Optional) The SQL fragment that is used when generating the DDL for the column.
The annotation @JoinColumn
indicates that this entity is the owner of the relationship (that is: the corresponding table has a column with a foreign key to the referenced table), whereas the attribute mappedBy
indicates that the entity in this side is the inverse of the relationship, and the owner resides in the "other" entity. This also means that you can access the other table from the class which you've annotated with "mappedBy" (fully bidirectional relationship).
In particular, for the code in the question the correct annotations would look like this:
@Entity public class Company { @OneToMany(mappedBy = "company", orphanRemoval = true, fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL) private List<Branch> branches; } @Entity public class Branch { @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY) @JoinColumn(name = "companyId") private Company company; }
@JoinColumn
could be used on both sides of the relationship. The question was about using @JoinColumn
on the @OneToMany
side (rare case). And the point here is in physical information duplication (column name) along with not optimized SQL query that will produce some additional UPDATE
statements.
According to documentation:
Since many to one are (almost) always the owner side of a bidirectional relationship in the JPA spec, the one to many association is annotated by @OneToMany(mappedBy=...)
@Entity public class Troop { @OneToMany(mappedBy="troop") public Set<Soldier> getSoldiers() { ... } @Entity public class Soldier { @ManyToOne @JoinColumn(name="troop_fk") public Troop getTroop() { ... }
Troop
has a bidirectional one to many relationship with Soldier
through the troop property. You don't have to (must not) define any physical mapping in the mappedBy
side.
To map a bidirectional one to many, with the one-to-many side as the owning side, you have to remove the mappedBy
element and set the many to one @JoinColumn
as insertable
and updatable
to false. This solution is not optimized and will produce some additional UPDATE
statements.
@Entity public class Troop { @OneToMany @JoinColumn(name="troop_fk") //we need to duplicate the physical information public Set<Soldier> getSoldiers() { ... } @Entity public class Soldier { @ManyToOne @JoinColumn(name="troop_fk", insertable=false, updatable=false) public Troop getTroop() { ... }
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With