I have a requirement where I'm asked to load both remote and local EJBs with a JNDI lookup, so without the @EJB annotation.
My EJB is defined as follows:
@Remote
public interface MyObjectInterfaceRemote extends MyObjectInterface {
}
@Local
public interface MyObjectInterfaceLocal extends MyObjectInterface {
}
public interface MyObjectInterface {
// A bunch of methods which both remote and local ejbs will inherit
}
@Remote(MyObjectInterfaceRemote.class)
@Local(MyObjectInterfaceLocal.class)
public class MyObjectEJB implements MyObjectInterfaceLocal, MyObjectInterfaceRemote {
//implementation of all methods inherited from MyObjectInterface.
}
I'm using this code to lookup the remote EJB:
private MyObjectInterfaceRemote getEJB() throws NamingException {
InitialContext context = new InitialContext();
return (MyObjectInterfaceRemote) context.lookup(MyObjectInterfaceRemote.class.getName());
}
It works fine, but if I make another method like this:
private MyObjectInterfaceLocal getLocalEJB() throws NamingException {
InitialContext context = new InitialContext();
return (MyObjectInterfaceLocal) context.lookup(MyObjectInterfaceLocal.class.getName());
}
I get
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException:
Context: Backslash-PCNode03Cell/nodes/Backslash-PCNode03/servers/server1,
name: MyObjectInterfaceLocal: First component in name MyObjectInterfaceLocal not found.
[Root exception is org.omg.CosNaming.NamingContextPackage.NotFound:
IDL:omg.org/CosNaming/NamingContext/NotFound:1.0]
[...]
What am I missing? Do I have to use something different to lookup a local ejb?
Note: If I use
@EJB
MyObjectInterfaceLocal ejb;
The local ejb gets succesfully loaded.
Have you tried below code?
context.lookup("ejblocal:"+MyObjectInterfaceLocal.class.getName())
Webshpere uses different default binding pattern for remote and local interfaces.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With