Please help me to understand why the following code works:
<script> var re = RegExp('\\ba\\b') ; alert(re.test('a')) ; alert(re.test('ab')) ; </script>
In the first line there is no new
operator.
As far as I know, a contructor in JavaScript is a function that initialize objects created by the operator new
and they are not meant to return anything.
No, this is not possible. Constructors that are created using the class keyword can only be constructed with new , if they are [[call]]ed without they always throw a TypeError 1 (and there's not even a way to detect this from the outside).
Constructor functions or, briefly, constructors, are regular functions, but there's a common agreement to name them with capital letter first. Constructor functions should only be called using new .
It is NOT 'bad' to use the new keyword. But if you forget it, you will be calling the object constructor as a regular function. If your constructor doesn't check its execution context then it won't notice that 'this' points to different object (ordinarily the global object) instead of the new instance.
The new keyword is used in javascript to create a object from a constructor function. The new keyword has to be placed before the constructor function call and will do the following things: Creates a new object. Sets the prototype of this object to the constructor function's prototype property.
In general, if something is documented as being a constructor, use new
with it. But in this case, RegExp
has a defined "factory" behavior for the situation where you've called it as a function instead. See Section 15.10.3 of the ECMAScript (JavaScript) specification (that links to the outgoing spec; the section number is the same in the new spec, which you can download from the ECMA front page [on the right-hand side]; I don't want to directly link to a ~4MB PDF file):
15.10.3 The RegExp Constructor Called as a Function
15.10.3.1 RegExp(pattern, flags)
If pattern is an object R whose [[Class]] property is "RegExp" and flags is undefined, then return R unchanged. Otherwise call the RegExp constructor (15.10.4.1), passing it the pattern and flags arguments and return the object constructed by that constructor.
You can actually define your own JavaScript constructor functions to allow omitting the new
keyword (by detecting they've been called as a function instead, and turning around and calling themselves correctly), but I wouldn't suggest it as it leads to misleading code. (And you can't do it with class
syntax, you have to use the older, clunkier function
syntax.)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With