I am confused about the current discussion of adding async functions and the keyword await
to the next EcmaScript.
I do not understand why it is necessary to have the async
keyword before the function
keyword.
From my point of view the await
keyword to wait for a result of a generator or promise done, a function's return
should be enough.
await
should simple be usable within normal functions and generator functions with no additional async
marker.
And if I need to create a function what should be usable as an result for an await
, I simply use a promise.
My reason for asking is this good explanation, where the following example comes from:
async function setupNewUser(name) { var invitations, newUser = await createUser(name), friends = await getFacebookFriends(name); if (friends) { invitations = await inviteFacebookFriends(friends); } // some more logic }
It also could be done as normal function, if the execution of a function will wait for finishing the hole function until all awaits are fulfilled.
function setupNewUser(name) { var invitations, newUser = await createUser(name), friends = await getFacebookFriends(name); if (friends) { invitations = await inviteFacebookFriends(friends); } // return because createUser() and getFacebookFriends() and maybe inviteFacebookFriends() finished their awaited result. }
In my opinion the whole function execution is holding until the next tick (await fulfillment) is done. The difference to Generator-Function is that the next() is triggering and changing the object's value and done field. A function instead will simple give back the result when it is done and the trigger is a function internal trigger like a while-loop.
Generator and Async-await — Comparison A generator function is executed yield by yield i.e one yield-expression at a time by its iterator (the next method) whereas async-await, they are executed sequential await by await. Async/await makes it easier to implement a particular use case of Generators.
functionality: yield and await can both be used to write asynchronous code that “waits”, which means code that looks as if it was synchronous, even though it really is asynchronous. await: This is an operator which used to wait for a Promise.
async functions use an implicit Promise to return results. Even if you don't return a promise explicitly, the async function makes sure that your code is passed through a promise. await blocks the code execution within the async function, of which it ( await statement ) is a part.
Promise chains can become difficult to understand sometimes. Using Async/Await makes it easier to read and understand the flow of the program as compared to promise chains.
I do not understand why it is necessary to have the
async
keyword before the function keyword.
For the same reason that we have the *
symbol before generator functions: They mark the function as extraordinary. They are quite similar in that regard - they add a visual marker that the body of this function does not run to completion by itself, but can be interleaved arbitrarily with other code.
*
denotes a generator function, which will always return a generator that can be advanced (and stopped) from outside by consuming it similar to an iterator.async
denotes an asynchronous function, which will always return a promise that depends on other promises and whose execution is concurrent to other asynchronous operations (and might be cancelled from outside).It's true that the keyword is not strictly necessary and the kind of the function could be determined by whether the respective keywords (yield(*)
/await
) appear in its body, but that would lead to less maintainable code:
a normal function, whose execution will wait for finishing the hole body until all awaits are fulfilled
That sounds like you want a blocking function, which is a very bad idea in a concurrent setting.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With