I am playing with app architecture and free monads in haskell. I've got it down, except for how to lift my "instruction" into the correct slot of my coproduct without explicitly giving the full Left/Right path.
Here's the haskell example I've been working from: https://gist.github.com/aaronlevin/87465696ba6c554bc72b#file-reasonable-hs
Here, to inject types into the coproduct, we explicitly mention the path.
For instance:
Program :: Coproduct Interaction (Coproduct Auth Logging) a
logC :: (Functor f) => (forall a. Logging a -> f a) -> String -> Free f ()
logger :: String -> Free Program ()
logger = logC (Program . Coproduct . Right . Coproduct . Right)
Here, logger has to be put in the right slot in the coproduct manually with Coproduct . Right . Coproduct . Right
Runar's talk in scala uses implicit type conversions and an Inject typeclass to achieve this result: https://gist.github.com/runarorama/a8fab38e473fafa0921d#file-gistfile1-scala-L119
In short, I'm wondering if there's a way to do this in haskell.
Filling out the answer section from the comments to the original question...
The original Haskell paper can be found here: Data Types à la Carte
A Haskell implementation can be found here: ALaCarte.hs
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With