I wanted to create a list of options for testing purposes. At first, I did this:
ArrayList<String> places = new ArrayList<String>(); places.add("Buenos Aires"); places.add("Córdoba"); places.add("La Plata");
Then, I refactored the code as follows:
ArrayList<String> places = new ArrayList<String>( Arrays.asList("Buenos Aires", "Córdoba", "La Plata"));
Is there a better way to do this?
Actually, probably the "best" way to initialize the ArrayList is the method you wrote, as it does not need to create a new List in any way: ArrayList<String> list = new ArrayList<String>(); list. add("A"); list.
List<String> list = List. of("foo", "bar", "baz"); Set<String> set = Set. of("foo", "bar", "baz");
To initialize an ArrayList in Java, you can create a new ArrayList with new keyword and ArrayList constructor. You may optionally pass a collection of elements, to ArrayList constructor, to add the elements to this ArrayList. Or you may use add() method to add elements to the ArrayList.
It would be simpler if you were to just declare it as a List
- does it have to be an ArrayList?
List<String> places = Arrays.asList("Buenos Aires", "Córdoba", "La Plata");
Or if you have only one element:
List<String> places = Collections.singletonList("Buenos Aires");
This would mean that places
is immutable (trying to change it will cause an UnsupportedOperationException
exception to be thrown).
To make a mutable list that is a concrete ArrayList
you can create an ArrayList
from the immutable list:
ArrayList<String> places = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList("Buenos Aires", "Córdoba", "La Plata"));
Actually, probably the "best" way to initialize the ArrayList
is the method you wrote, as it does not need to create a new List
in any way:
ArrayList<String> list = new ArrayList<String>(); list.add("A"); list.add("B"); list.add("C");
The catch is that there is quite a bit of typing required to refer to that list
instance.
There are alternatives, such as making an anonymous inner class with an instance initializer (also known as an "double brace initialization"):
ArrayList<String> list = new ArrayList<String>() {{ add("A"); add("B"); add("C"); }};
However, I'm not too fond of that method because what you end up with is a subclass of ArrayList
which has an instance initializer, and that class is created just to create one object -- that just seems like a little bit overkill to me.
What would have been nice was if the Collection Literals proposal for Project Coin was accepted (it was slated to be introduced in Java 7, but it's not likely to be part of Java 8 either.):
List<String> list = ["A", "B", "C"];
Unfortunately it won't help you here, as it will initialize an immutable List
rather than an ArrayList
, and furthermore, it's not available yet, if it ever will be.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With