Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How to test model's callback method independently?

I had a method in a model:

class Article < ActiveRecord::Base
  def do_something
  end
end

I also had a unit test for this method:

# spec/models/article_spec.rb
describe "#do_something" do
  @article = FactoryGirl.create(:article)
  it "should work as expected" do
    @article.do_something
    expect(@article).to have_something
  end
  # ...several other examples for different cases
end

Everything was fine until I found it's better to move this method into a after_save callback:

class Article < ActiveRecord::Base
  after_save :do_something

  def do_something
  end
end

Now all my tests about this method broken. I have to fix it by:

  • No more specific call to do_something because create or save will trigger this method as well, or I'll meet duplicate db actions.
  • Change create to build
  • Test respond_to
  • Use general model.save instead of individual method call model.do_something

    describe "#do_something" do
      @article = FactoryGirl.build(:article)
      it "should work as expected" do
        expect{@article.save}.not_to raise_error
        expect(@article).to have_something
        expect(@article).to respond_to(:do_something)
      end
    end
    

The test passed but my concern is it's no longer about the specific method. The effect will be mixed with other callbacks if more added.

My question is, is there any beautiful way to test model's instance methods independently that becoming a callback?

like image 218
Billy Chan Avatar asked May 21 '13 19:05

Billy Chan


4 Answers

Callback and Callback behavior are independent tests. If you want to check an after_save callback, you need to think of it as two things:

  1. Is the callback being fired for the right events?
  2. Is the called function doing the right thing?

Assume you have the Article class with many callbacks, this is how you would test:

class Article < ActiveRecord::Base
  after_save    :do_something
  after_destroy :do_something_else
  ...
end

it "triggers do_something on save" do
  expect(@article).to receive(:do_something)
  @article.save
end

it "triggers do_something_else on destroy" do
  expect(@article).to receive(:do_something_else)
  @article.destroy
end

it "#do_something should work as expected" do
  # Actual tests for do_something method
end

This decouples your callbacks from behavior. For example, you could trigger the same callback method article.do_something when some other related object is updated, say like user.before_save { user.article.do_something }. This will accomodate all those.

So, keep testing your methods as usual. Worry about the callbacks separately.

Edit: typos and potential misconceptions Edit: change "do something" to "trigger something"

like image 59
Subhas Avatar answered Nov 19 '22 06:11

Subhas


You can use shoulda-callback-matchers to test existence of your callbacks without calling them.

describe Article do
  it { is_expected.to callback(:do_something).after(:save) }
end

If you also want to test the behaviour of the callback:

describe Article do
  ...

  describe "#do_something" do
    it "gives the article something" do
      @article.save
      expect(@article).to have_something
    end
  end
end
like image 34
Filip Bartuzi Avatar answered Nov 19 '22 06:11

Filip Bartuzi


I like to use ActiveRecord #run_callbacks method to make sure callbacks are been called without need to hit database. This way it runs faster.

describe "#save" do
  let(:article) { FactoryBot.build(:article) }
  it "runs .do_something after save" do
    expect(article).to receive(:do_something)
    article.run_callbacks(:save)
  end
end

And to test the behavior of #do_something you add another test specifically for that.

describe "#do_something" do
  let(:article) { FactoryBot.build(:article) }
  it "return thing" do
    expect(article.do_something).to be_eq("thing")
  end
end
like image 3
Germano Avatar answered Nov 19 '22 07:11

Germano


In the spirit of Sandi Metz and minimalist testing, the suggestion in https://stackoverflow.com/a/16678194/2001785 to confirm the call to a possibly private method does not seem right to me.

Testing a publicly-observable side-effect or confirming an outgoing command message makes more sense to me. Christian Rolle provided an example at http://www.chrisrolle.com/en/blog/activerecord-callback-tests-with-rspec.

like image 2
bhfailor Avatar answered Nov 19 '22 07:11

bhfailor