I want to run a thread (Which does some time consuming task in background and does NOT update UI) it just downloads some files form the internet and it is independent from the UI.
I want to run this thread repeatedly after some time interval.
How can i do this, I have thread something like below:
boolean mResult =false;
void onCreate()
{
DownloadThread mDownloadThread = new DownloadThread();
mDownloadThread.start();
}
class DownloadThread extends Thread implements Runnable
{
public void run()
{
// My download code
mResult = result;
}
}
Do i need to use Handler
for implementing this?
By using join you can ensure running of a thread one after another.
This can be achieved by calling the join() function on the threading. Thread instance for the new thread. This call will block, meaning that the main thread will not carry on executing until this function call returns, and this function call will only return once the thread that has been joined terminates.
The only way to stop an arbitrary thread is by interrupting it. Keep a reference to it then call the interrupt method. Save this answer.
when sleep() is called on thread it goes from running to waiting state and can return to runnable state when sleep time is up. b. sleep() is a static method, causes the currently executing thread to sleep for the specified number of milliseconds.
Option 1:
volatile boolean flag = true;
public void run()
{
while(flag)
{
// Do your task
try{
Thread.Sleep(interval);
} catch(Exception e){
}
}
}
Option 2:
Timer timer = new Timer();
timer.scheduleAtFixedRate(new TimerTask() {
@Override
public void run() {
// Do your task
}
}, 0, interval);
Option 3:
volatile boolean flag = true;
public void someMethod(){
// Do your task
try{
Thread.Sleep(interval);
} catch(Exception e){
}
if(flag)
return;
else
someMethod();
}
Option 4:
final Handler handler = new Handler();
volatile boolean flag = true;
Class A implements Runnable{
public void run(){
// Do your Task
}
if(!flag)
handler.postDelayed(a, interval);
}
A a = new A();
handler.postDelayed(a);
There will be many more options. I never tried option 3 and 4. It just came to my mind and I wrote. If I were you I would use any of 1 or 2.
Prefered choice is
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService
Newer and robust implementation, More here ScheduledExecutorService
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With