The task is to implement a bit count logic using only bitwise operators. I got it working fine, but am wondering if someone can suggest a more elegant approach.
Only Bitwise ops are allowed. No "if", "for" etc
int x = 4;
printf("%d\n", x & 0x1);
printf("%d\n", (x >> 1) & 0x1);
printf("%d\n", (x >> 2) & 0x1);
printf("%d\n", (x >> 3) & 0x1);
Thank you.
The ^ (bitwise XOR) in C or C++ takes two numbers as operands and does XOR on every bit of two numbers. The result of XOR is 1 if the two bits are different. The << (left shift) in C or C++ takes two numbers, left shifts the bits of the first operand, the second operand decides the number of places to shift.
5.2. Bitwise OR. Along with integer operands, the bitwise OR can also be used with boolean operands. It returns true if at least one of the operands is true, otherwise, it returns false.
From http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#CountBitsSetParallel
unsigned int v; // count bits set in this (32-bit value)
unsigned int c; // store the total here
c = v - ((v >> 1) & 0x55555555);
c = ((c >> 2) & 0x33333333) + (c & 0x33333333);
c = ((c >> 4) + c) & 0x0F0F0F0F;
c = ((c >> 8) + c) & 0x00FF00FF;
c = ((c >> 16) + c) & 0x0000FFFF;
Edit: Admittedly it's a bit optimized which makes it harder to read. It's easier to read as:
c = (v & 0x55555555) + ((v >> 1) & 0x55555555);
c = (c & 0x33333333) + ((c >> 2) & 0x33333333);
c = (c & 0x0F0F0F0F) + ((c >> 4) & 0x0F0F0F0F);
c = (c & 0x00FF00FF) + ((c >> 8) & 0x00FF00FF);
c = (c & 0x0000FFFF) + ((c >> 16)& 0x0000FFFF);
Each step of those five, adds neighbouring bits together in groups of 1, then 2, then 4 etc. The method is based in divide and conquer.
In the first step we add together bits 0 and 1 and put the result in the two bit segment 0-1, add bits 2 and 3 and put the result in the two-bit segment 2-3 etc...
In the second step we add the two-bits 0-1 and 2-3 together and put the result in four-bit 0-3, add together two-bits 4-5 and 6-7 and put the result in four-bit 4-7 etc...
Example:
So if I have number 395 in binary 0000000110001011 (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1)
After the first step I have: 0000000101000110 (0+0 0+0 0+0 0+1 1+0 0+0 1+0 1+1) = 00 00 00 01 01 00 01 10
In the second step I have: 0000000100010011 ( 00+00 00+01 01+00 01+10 ) = 0000 0001 0001 0011
In the fourth step I have: 0000000100000100 ( 0000+0001 0001+0011 ) = 00000001 00000100
In the last step I have: 0000000000000101 ( 00000001+00000100 )
which is equal to 5, which is the correct result
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With