I have latitudes and longitudes, so I need to redefine the RBF kernel into exp(-1/2||sophere distrance||^2), which means I need to rewrite a kernel function myself. I write my kernel as follows:
round.kernel <- function(x,y){
sigma <- 1
#R <- 6371
R <- 1
a <- (sin( (x[1]-y[1])/2 ))^2+cos(x[1])*cos(y[1])*(sin((x[2]-y[2])/2))^2
c <- 2*atan2(sqrt(a),sqrt(1-a))
d <- R*c
res <- exp(-d^2/(2*sigma))
return (res)
}
class(round.kernel) <- "kernel"
I tested the function, the kernel should be correct. But with the following training command I am getting the error:
fit <- ksvm(y=train[,2],x=train[,3:4],kernel=round.kernel,type='eps-svr')
Error in .local(x, ...) :
List interface supports only the stringdot kernel.
The more trickly thing is, I tried the sample code in ksvm document:
k <- function(x,y) {(sum(x*y) +1)*exp(-0.001*sum((x-y)^2))}
class(k) <- "kernel"
But I am getting the same error.
Anyone knows how to correctly define a kernel function?
My problem is solved as follows: the kernel codes are correct, I should directly define a function(x,y), and declare its class as "kernel". The problem is even in the doc the ksvm does support x,y styles, they actually do not work. Changing it to formula-data style can finally get things running:
fit <- ksvm(Freq~lat+lon,data=train[,2:4],kernel=roundrbf,type='eps-svr')
Moreover, I also read the source code of rbfdot, and other kernels defined in the kernlab itself. Notice their codes style is like this:
function(params){
val <- function(x,y){
# True kernel defined here
}
return (new ("kernel_name",.Data=val,kpar=list(params)))
}
But seriously, I tried, and making the kernel functions in this style won't work. The working way is like this style directly:
k <- function(x,y){
#calculate the result
}
class(k) <- "kernel"
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With