Here is the solution that works for me.
FactoryGirl.define do
factory :company do
#company attributes
end
factory :user do
companies {[FactoryGirl.create(:company)]}
#user attributes
end
end
if you will need specific company you can use factory this way
company = FactoryGirl.create(:company, #{company attributes})
user = FactoryGirl.create(:user, :companies => [company])
Hope this will be helpful for somebody.
Factorygirl has since been updated and now includes callbacks to solve this problem. Take a look at http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/254496652/aint-no-calla-back-girl for more info.
In my opinion, Just create two different factories like:
Factory.define :user, :class => User do |u| # Just normal attributes initialization end Factory.define :company, :class => Company do |u| # Just normal attributes initialization end
When you write the test-cases for user then just write like this
Factory(:user, :companies => [Factory(:company)])
Hope it will work.
I couldn´t find an example for the above mentioned case on the provided website. (Only 1:N and polymorphic assocations, but no habtm). I had a similar case and my code looks like this:
Factory.define :user do |user|
user.name "Foo Bar"
user.after_create { |u| Factory(:company, :users => [u]) }
end
Factory.define :company do |c|
c.name "Acme"
end
What worked for me was setting the association when using the factory. Using your example:
user = Factory(:user)
company = Factory(:company)
company.users << user
company.save!
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With