I need a completely in-memory object that I can give to BufReader
and BufWriter
. Something like Python's StringIO
. I want to write to and read from such an object using methods ordinarily used with File
s.
Is there a way to do this using the standard library?
In fact there is a way: Cursor<T>
!
(please also read Shepmaster's answer on why often it's even easier)
In the documentation you can see that there are the following impls:
impl<T> Seek for Cursor<T> where T: AsRef<[u8]>
impl<T> Read for Cursor<T> where T: AsRef<[u8]>
impl Write for Cursor<Vec<u8>>
impl<T> AsRef<[T]> for Vec<T>
From this you can see that you can use the type Cursor<Vec<u8>>
just as an ordinary file, because Read
, Write
and Seek
are implemented for that type!
Little example (Playground):
use std::io::{Cursor, Read, Seek, SeekFrom, Write};
// Create fake "file"
let mut c = Cursor::new(Vec::new());
// Write into the "file" and seek to the beginning
c.write_all(&[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]).unwrap();
c.seek(SeekFrom::Start(0)).unwrap();
// Read the "file's" contents into a vector
let mut out = Vec::new();
c.read_to_end(&mut out).unwrap();
println!("{:?}", out);
For a more useful example, check the documentation linked above.
You don't need a Cursor
most of the time.
object that I can give to
BufReader
andBufWriter
BufReader
requires a value that implements Read
:
impl<R: Read> BufReader<R> {
pub fn new(inner: R) -> BufReader<R>
}
BufWriter
requires a value that implements Write
:
impl<W: Write> BufWriter<W> {
pub fn new(inner: W) -> BufWriter<W> {}
}
If you view the implementors of Read
you will find impl<'a> Read for &'a [u8]
.
If you view the implementors of Write
, you will find impl Write for Vec<u8>
.
use std::io::{Read, Write};
fn main() {
// Create fake "file"
let mut file = Vec::new();
// Write into the "file"
file.write_all(&[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]).unwrap();
// Read the "file's" contents into a new vector
let mut out = Vec::new();
let mut c = file.as_slice();
c.read_to_end(&mut out).unwrap();
println!("{:?}", out);
}
Writing to a Vec
will always append to the end. We also take a slice to the Vec
that we can update. Each read of c
will advance the slice further and further until it is empty.
The main differences from Cursor
:
If you want to use BufReader
with an in-memory String
, you can use the as_bytes()
method:
use std::io::BufRead;
use std::io::BufReader;
use std::io::Read;
fn read_buff<R: Read>(mut buffer: BufReader<R>) {
let mut data = String::new();
let _ = buffer.read_line(&mut data);
println!("read_buff got {}", data);
}
fn main() {
read_buff(BufReader::new("Potato!".as_bytes()));
}
This prints read_buff got Potato!
. There is no need to use a cursor for this case.
To use an in-memory String
with BufWriter
, you can use the as_mut_vec
method. Unfortunately it is unsafe
and I have not found any other way. I don't like the Cursor
approach since it consumes the vector and I have not found a way yet to use the Cursor
together with BufWriter
.
use std::io::BufWriter;
use std::io::Write;
pub fn write_something<W: Write>(mut buf: BufWriter<W>) {
buf.write("potato".as_bytes());
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
use std::io::{BufWriter};
#[test]
fn testing_bufwriter_and_string() {
let mut s = String::new();
write_something(unsafe { BufWriter::new(s.as_mut_vec()) });
assert_eq!("potato", &s);
}
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With