I would like to replicate the behavior and ergonomics of taking a closure/function as an argument much like map
does: iterator.map(|x| ...)
.
I've noticed that some library code allows passing in async functionality, but this method doesn't allow me to pass in arguments:
pub fn spawn<F, T>(future: F) -> JoinHandle<T>
where
F: Future<Output = T> + Send + 'static,
T: Send + 'static,
spawn(async { foo().await });
I'm hoping to do one of the following:
iterator.map(async |x| {...});
async fn a(x: _) {}
iterator.map(a)
Inside an async function, you can use the await keyword before a call to a function that returns a promise. This makes the code wait at that point until the promise is settled, at which point the fulfilled value of the promise is treated as a return value, or the rejected value is thrown.
An async function (or AyncFunction) in the context of Async is an asynchronous function with a variable number of parameters where the final parameter is a callback.
An async function can have more than one await expression in its scope which can pause the execution inside its function scope. Once the passed Promise has been resolved, it will resume the async function's execution.
To return values from async functions using async-await from function with JavaScript, we return the resolve value of the promise. const getData = async () => { return await axios.
An async function is a function declared with the async keyword, and the await keyword is permitted within them. The async and await keywords enable asynchronous, promise-based behavior to be written in a cleaner style, avoiding the need to explicitly configure promise chains. Async functions may also be defined as expressions.
The behavior of async / await is similar to combining generators and promises. Async functions always return a promise. If the return value of an async function is not explicitly a promise, it will be implicitly wrapped in a promise. For example, the following: async function foo() { return 1 }. ...is equivalent to:
The output of the 1st example is: It is not a problem if you simply call your async function as a function expression, but when you pass your async function as a parameter into a function especially a 3rd-party function, you’re passing it into a black box, and you’ll lose control of your async function’s execution.
Async functions always return a promise. If the return value of an async function is not explicitly a promise, it will be implicitly wrapped in a promise. For example, the following: async function foo() { return 1 }
async
functions are effectively desugared as returning impl Future
. Once you know that, it's a matter of combining existing Rust techniques to accept a function / closure, resulting in a function with two generic types:
use std::future::Future;
async fn example<F, Fut>(f: F)
where
F: FnOnce(i32, i32) -> Fut,
Fut: Future<Output = bool>,
{
f(1, 2).await;
}
This can also be written as
use std::future::Future;
async fn example<Fut>(f: impl FnOnce(i32, i32) -> Fut)
where
Fut: Future<Output = bool>,
{
f(1, 2).await;
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With