Take a trivial example where a column of data needs to be represented by an enumerated type in SQL:
+------------------------------------------+
| user |
+----+------+-----+------------------------+
| id | name | age | relationship_status_id |
+----+------+-----+------------------------+
| 1 | John | 27 | 3 |
| 2 | Mary | 77 | 1 |
| 3 | Jack | 40 | 4 |
+----+------+-----+------------------------+
+---------------------+
| relationship_status |
+----+----------------+
| id | name |
+----+----------------+
| 1 | married |
| 2 | widowed |
| 3 | single |
| 4 | divorced |
+----+----------------+
Defining (declaring) the tables themselves in SQLAlchemy is relatively straightforward:
from sqlalchemy import Column, ForeignKey, Integer, String
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
Base = declarative_base()
class User(Base):
__tablename__ = 'user'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
name = Column(String)
age = Column(Integer)
relationship_status_id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey('relationship_status.id'))
class RelationshipStatus(Base):
__tablename__ = 'relationship_status'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
name = Column(String)
When initializing the database, tables can be created with a Base.metadata.create_all(engine)
directive. The user
table would be filled during the application's running lifetime; however, the relationship_status
lookup table's data remains constant, and it seems appropriate to "declare" this data along with the table definition.
Yet persisting data to a table naturally requires a session
, and unlike the table definitions themselves, SQLAlchemy does not seem to offer any declarative construct for "expected rows" in a given table (naturally, since the majority of tables in any application are like user
with dynamic data).
Using SQLAlchemy, how can one declare both the schema and data of a lookup table before application runtime? Ideally, the solution would involve the creation of some Enum-like construct containing the data that other parts of the application could reference.
The creator of SQLAlchemy proposed the enum recipe. The only apparent downside of such a solution is that one must rely on the enum
datatype within the DBMS being used. For the scope of this question, a DBMS-independent lookup table solution is preferred.
A related alternative also proposed by SQLAlchemy's creator is the unique object recipe. Such an implementation ensures that the rows returned by lookup table queries remain without duplicates, but a session
object is still required to make any declarations or requests--blurring the separation of concerns between database definition and implementation. Furthermore, clients would all simply need to "just know" what rows to ask for rather than having some sort of enum (within Python) for reference.
The root of the issue may be conceptual rather than tied to SQLAlchemy or Python. In either case, any advice would be much appreciated.
All SELECT statements generated by SQLAlchemy ORM are constructed by Query object. It provides a generative interface, hence successive calls return a new Query object, a copy of the former with additional criteria and options associated with it.
Update table elements in SQLAlchemy. Get the books to table from the Metadata object initialized while connecting to the database. Pass the update query to the execute() function and get all the results using fetchall() function. Use a for loop to iterate through the results.
filter() - filter on SQL expressions. method sqlalchemy.orm.Query. first() Return the first result of this Query or None if the result doesn't contain any row.
The sqlalchemy table is the feature and it is mainly called for to create the database tables on the existing database. Not only for existing we can create the new database along with the database drivers, and ports to connect the database to the UI or the front end of the application.
To check the effect of above operations, use SQLiteStudio and view data in department, employee and link tables − SQLAlchemy uses system of dialects to communicate with various types of databases. Each database has a corresponding DBAPI wrapper.
The SQL Expression Language constructs its expressions against table columns. SQLAlchemy Column object represents a column in a database table which is in turn represented by a Tableobject. Metadata contains definitions of tables and associated objects such as index, view, triggers, etc.
The different ways in which we can map the columns in SQLAlchemy are – In the below example, the column mapping is done by mapping each of the table columns as class attributes. Each of the attributes is provided with the same name as the corresponding table columns that it represents.
First, I'd argue that in most situations, data that is constant and known at application development time is not generally a good fit for storing in a database. I'd use either a DBMS-based enumeration or a Python-based enumeration and a check constraint to guarantee that each row in the users table had a valid relationship status. Since you said you're not going to do that, it sounds like you're looking for a way to trigger some inserts at the time that your relationship_status table is created. I've adapted the after_create example to insert something into a table instead of altering the table. You should be able to adapt this to go insert your relationship status values.
from sqlalchemy import event
from sqlalchemy import Table, Column, Metadata, Integer
m = MetaData()
some_table = Table('some_table', m, Column('data', Integer))
def after_create(target, connection, **kw):
connection.execute("insert into %s values ('1','single');" %
(target.name))
event.listen(some_table, "after_create", after_create)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With