data Thing = Thing {a :: Int, b :: Int, c :: Int, (...) , z :: Int} deriving Show
foo = Thing 1 2 3 4 5 (...) 26
mkBar x = x { c = 30 }
main = do print $ mkBar foo
What is copied over when I mutate foo in this way? As opposed to mutating part of a structure directly.
Data Thing = Thing {a :: IORef Int, b :: IORef Int, (...) , z :: IORef Int}
instance Show Thing where
(...something something unsafePerformIO...)
mkFoo = do a <- newIORef 1
(...)
z <- newIORef 26
return Thing a b (...) z
mkBar x = writeIORef (c x) 30
main = do foo <- mkFoo
mkBar foo
print foo
Does compiling with optimizations change this behavior?
If you mean Internal as the DNS that may provide you firewall, it is your own DNS that is resolving (or forwarding requests) in your internal LAN. On the other side, the external DNS is the public DNS that resolves the domain request from internet.
Only clients joined to the domain and with a valid Kerberos ticket can perform Secure DDNS updates. If a DHCP server is to perform this task, it must be a member of the DNS Proxy group.
In order to synchronize the DNS information, the Secondary servers will periodically check with the Primary server to see if there have been any changes in the data hosted there. If they detect a change, they will pull down the update.
In the first example, the pointers to the unchanged Int
components are copied (and the constructor tag, if you wish to say so). It doesn't make much difference whether an Int
or a pointer to one is copied, but if the components were large structures, it would.
Since the fields are not strict, the behaviour is, afaik, independent of optimisation. If the fields were strict, with optimisations, they might be unpacked into the constructor and then the raw Int#
values would be copied.
In the second example, nothing is copied, the contents of the IORef
are overwritten.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With