I have been using PRETTY_FUNCTION to output the current function name, however I have reimplemented some functions and would like to find out which functions are calling them.
In C++ how can I get the function name of the calling routine?
The calling function supplies the input (the actual arguments), which are then used by the called function to process the parameters because it has the definition, carry out the instructions, and return whatever that should be returned. The function that another function calls is known as the called function.
A function call is an expression that passes control and arguments (if any) to a function and has the form: expression (expression-listopt) where expression is a function name or evaluates to a function address and expression-list is a list of expressions (separated by commas).
Recursion is the process of repeating items in a self-similar way. In programming languages, if a program allows you to call a function inside the same function, then it is called a recursive call of the function.
Here is a solution you can often use. It has the advantage of requiring no changes to the actual function code (no adding calls to stackwalk functions, changing parameters to pass in function names, or linking to extra libraries.). To get it working, you simply need to use a bit of preprocessor magic:
// orignal function name was 'FunctionName' void FunctionNameReal(...) { // Do Something } #undef FunctionName #define FunctionName printf("Calling FunctionName from %s\n",__FUNCTION__);FunctionNameReal
You must rename your function temporarily, but see the note below for more suggestions. This will result in a printf()
statement at each point of calling the function. Obviously, you have to make some arrangements if you are calling a member function, or need to capture the return value (Like pass the function call and __FUNCTION__
to a custom function that returns the same type...), but the basic technique is the same. You might want to use __LINE__
and __FILE__
or some other preprocessor macros depending on which compiler you have. (This example is specifically for MS VC++, but probably works in others.)
Also, you might want to put something like this in your header surrounded by #ifdef
guards to conditionally turn it on, which can handle renaming the actual function for you as well.
I got a request to expand my answer. As it turns out, my above example is a bit simplistic. Here are some fully compiling examples of handling this, using C++.
Using a class
with operator()
makes this pretty straight forward. This first technique works for freestanding functions with and without return values. operator()
just needs to reflect the same return as the function in question, and have matching arguments.
You can compile this with g++ -o test test.cpp
for a non-reporting version and g++ -o test test.cpp -DREPORT
for a version that displays the caller information.
#include <iostream> int FunctionName(int one, int two) { static int calls=0; return (++calls+one)*two; } #ifdef REPORT // class to capture the caller and print it. class Reporter { public: Reporter(std::string Caller, std::string File, int Line) : caller_(Caller) , file_(File) , line_(Line) {} int operator()(int one, int two) { std::cout << "Reporter: FunctionName() is being called by " << caller_ << "() in " << file_ << ":" << line_ << std::endl; // can use the original name here, as it is still defined return FunctionName(one,two); } private: std::string caller_; std::string file_; int line_; }; // remove the symbol for the function, then define a new version that instead // creates a stack temporary instance of Reporter initialized with the caller # undef FunctionName # define FunctionName Reporter(__FUNCTION__,__FILE__,__LINE__) #endif void Caller1() { int val = FunctionName(7,9); // <-- works for captured return value std::cout << "Mystery Function got " << val << std::endl; } void Caller2() { // Works for inline as well. std::cout << "Mystery Function got " << FunctionName(11,13) << std::endl; } int main(int argc, char** argv) { Caller1(); Caller2(); return 0; }
Sample Output (Reporting)
Reporter: FunctionName() is being called by Caller1() in test.cpp:44 Mystery Function got 72 Reporter: FunctionName() is being called by Caller2() in test.cpp:51 Mystery Function got 169
Basically, anywhere that FunctionName
occurs, it replaces it with Reporter(__FUNCTION__,__FILE__,__LINE__)
, the net effect of which is the preprocessor writing some object instancing with an immediate call to the operator()
function. You can view the result (in gcc) of the preprocessor substitutions with g++ -E -DREPORT test.cpp
. Caller2() becomes this:
void Caller2() { std::cout << "Mystery Function got " << Reporter(__FUNCTION__,"test.cpp",51)(11,13) << std::endl; }
You can see that __LINE__
and __FILE__
have been substituted. (I'm not sure why __FUNCTION__
still shows in the output to be honest, but the compiled version reports the right function, so it probably has something to do with multi-pass preprocessing or a gcc bug.)
This is a bit more complicated, but very similar to the previous example. Instead of just replacing the call to the function, we are also replacing the class.
Like the above example, you can compile this with g++ -o test test.cpp
for a non-reporting version and g++ -o test test.cpp -DREPORT
for a version that displays the caller information.
#include <iostream> class ClassName { public: explicit ClassName(int Member) : member_(Member) {} int FunctionName(int one, int two) { return (++member_+one)*two; } private: int member_; }; #ifdef REPORT // class to capture the caller and print it. class ClassNameDecorator { public: ClassNameDecorator( int Member) : className_(Member) {} ClassNameDecorator& FunctionName(std::string Caller, std::string File, int Line) { std::cout << "Reporter: ClassName::FunctionName() is being called by " << Caller << "() in " << File << ":" << Line << std::endl; return *this; } int operator()(int one, int two) { return className_.FunctionName(one,two); } private: ClassName className_; }; // remove the symbol for the function, then define a new version that instead // creates a stack temporary instance of ClassNameDecorator. // FunctionName is then replaced with a version that takes the caller information // and uses Method Chaining to allow operator() to be invoked with the original // parameters. # undef ClassName # define ClassName ClassNameDecorator # undef FunctionName # define FunctionName FunctionName(__FUNCTION__,__FILE__,__LINE__) #endif void Caller1() { ClassName foo(21); int val = foo.FunctionName(7,9); // <-- works for captured return value std::cout << "Mystery Function got " << val << std::endl; } void Caller2() { ClassName foo(42); // Works for inline as well. std::cout << "Mystery Function got " << foo.FunctionName(11,13) << std::endl; } int main(int argc, char** argv) { Caller1(); Caller2(); return 0; }
Here is sample output:
Reporter: ClassName::FunctionName() is being called by Caller1() in test.cpp:56 Mystery Function got 261 Reporter: ClassName::FunctionName() is being called by Caller2() in test.cpp:64 Mystery Function got 702
The high points of this version are a class that decorates the original class, and a replacement function that returns a reference to the class instance, allowing the operator()
to do the actual function call.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With