As an extension to this question Are const_iterators
faster?, I have another question on const_iterators
. How to remove constness of a const_iterator
? Though iterators are generalised form of pointers but still const_iterator
and iterator
s are two different things. Hence, I believe, I also cannot use const_cast<>
to covert from const_iterator
to iterator
s.
One approach could be that you define an iterator which moves 'til the element to which const_iterator
points. But this looks to be a linear time algorithm.
Any idea on what is the best way to achieve this?
There is a solution with constant time complexity in C++11: for any sequence, associative, or unordered associative container (including all of the Standard Library containers), you can call the range-erase member function with an empty range:
template <typename Container, typename ConstIterator> typename Container::iterator remove_constness(Container& c, ConstIterator it) { return c.erase(it, it); }
The range-erase member functions have a pair of const_iterator
parameters, but they return an iterator
. Because an empty range is provided, the call to erase does not change the contents of the container.
Hat tip to Howard Hinnant and Jon Kalb for this trick.
Unfortunately linear time is the only way to do it:
iter i(d.begin()); advance (i,distance<ConstIter>(i,ci));
where iter and constIter are suitable typedefs and d is the container over which you are iterating.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With