I was wondering is there any way other than building a wrapper for mocking the FromSql
? I know this method is static, but since they added things like AddEntityFrameworkInMemoryDatabase
to entity framework core, I thought there might be a solution for this too, I use EF Core 1.0.1 in my project.
My end goal is to test this method:
public List<Models.ClosestLocation> Handle(ClosestLocationsQuery message)
{
return _context.ClosestLocations.FromSql(
"EXEC GetClosestLocations {0}, {1}, {2}, {3}",
message.LocationQuery.Latitude,
message.LocationQuery.Longitude,
message.LocationQuery.MaxRecordsToReturn ?? 10,
message.LocationQuery.Distance ?? 10
).ToList();
}
I want to ensure that my query is handled with the same object that I passed into it, based on this answer in entity framework 6 I could do something like this:
[Fact]
public void HandleInvokesGetClosestLocationsWithCorrectData()
{
var message = new ClosestLocationsQuery
{
LocationQuery =
new LocationQuery {Distance = 1, Latitude = 1.165, Longitude = 1.546, MaxRecordsToReturn = 1}
};
var dbSetMock = new Mock<DbSet<Models.ClosestLocation>>();
dbSetMock.Setup(m => m.FromSql(It.IsAny<string>(), message))
.Returns(It.IsAny<IQueryable<Models.ClosestLocation>>());
var contextMock = new Mock<AllReadyContext>();
contextMock.Setup(c => c.Set<Models.ClosestLocation>()).Returns(dbSetMock.Object);
var sut = new ClosestLocationsQueryHandler(contextMock.Object);
var results = sut.Handle(message);
contextMock.Verify(x => x.ClosestLocations.FromSql(It.IsAny<string>(), It.Is<ClosestLocationsQuery>(y =>
y.LocationQuery.Distance == message.LocationQuery.Distance &&
y.LocationQuery.Latitude == message.LocationQuery.Latitude &&
y.LocationQuery.Longitude == message.LocationQuery.Longitude &&
y.LocationQuery.MaxRecordsToReturn == message.LocationQuery.MaxRecordsToReturn)));
}
But unlike SqlQuery<T>
in EF 6, the FromSql<T>
in EF Core is static extension method, I'm asking this question because I think I might approach this problem from the wrong angle or there might be a better alternative than a wrapper, I'd appreciate any thought on this.
I also fell into the same situation and answer given by Philippe helped but it the main method was throwing System.ArgumentNullException
.
From this link, I was finally able to write some unit tests...
Here is my class under test:
public class HolidayDataAccess : IHolidayDataAccess
{
private readonly IHolidayDataContext holDataContext;
public HolidayDataAccess(IHolidayDataContext holDataContext)
{
this.holDataContext = holDataContext;
}
public async Task<IEnumerable<HolidayDate>> GetHolidayDates(DateTime startDate, DateTime endDate)
{
using (this.holDataContext)
{
IList<HolidayDate> dates = await holDataContext.Dates.FromSql($"[dba].[usp_GetHolidayDates] @StartDate = {startDate}, @EndDate = {endDate}").AsNoTracking().ToListAsync();
return dates;
}
}
}
and here is the test method:
[TestMethod]
public async Task GetHolidayDates_Should_Only_Return_The_Dates_Within_Given_Range()
{
// Arrange.
SpAsyncEnumerableQueryable<HolidayDate> dates = new SpAsyncEnumerableQueryable<HolidayDate>();
dates.Add(new HolidayDate() { Date = new DateTime(2018, 05, 01) });
dates.Add(new HolidayDate() { Date = new DateTime(2018, 07, 01) });
dates.Add(new HolidayDate() { Date = new DateTime(2018, 04, 01) });
dates.Add(new HolidayDate() { Date = new DateTime(2019, 03, 01) });
dates.Add(new HolidayDate() { Date = new DateTime(2019, 02, 15) });
var options = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<HolidayDataContext>()
.UseInMemoryDatabase(databaseName: Guid.NewGuid().ToString())
.Options;
HolidayDataContext context = new HolidayDataContext(options);
context.Dates = context.Dates.MockFromSql(dates);
HolidayDataAccess dataAccess = new HolidayDataAccess(context);
//Act.
IEnumerable<HolidayDate> resutlDates = await dataAccess.GetHolidayDates(new DateTime(2018, 01, 01), new DateTime(2018, 05, 31));
// Assert.
Assert.AreEqual(resutlDates.Any(d => d.Date != new DateTime(2019, 03, 01)), true);
Assert.AreEqual(resutlDates.Any(d => d.Date != new DateTime(2019, 02, 15)), true);
// we do not need to call this becuase we are using a using block for the context...
//context.Database.EnsureDeleted();
}
To use UseInMemoryDatabase
you need to add Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory
package from NuGet
The helper classes are here:
public class SpAsyncEnumerableQueryable<T> : IAsyncEnumerable<T>, IQueryable<T>
{
private readonly IList<T> listOfSpReocrds;
public Type ElementType => throw new NotImplementedException();
public IQueryProvider Provider => new Mock<IQueryProvider>().Object;
Expression IQueryable.Expression => throw new NotImplementedException();
public SpAsyncEnumerableQueryable()
{
this.listOfSpReocrds = new List<T>();
}
public void Add(T spItem) // this is new method added to allow xxx.Add(new T) style of adding sp records...
{
this.listOfSpReocrds.Add(spItem);
}
public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator()
{
return this.listOfSpReocrds.GetEnumerator();
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return GetEnumerator();
}
IAsyncEnumerator<T> IAsyncEnumerable<T>.GetEnumerator()
{
return listOfSpReocrds.ToAsyncEnumerable().GetEnumerator();
}
}
...and the Db extensions class that contains the mock of FromSql method..
public static class DbSetExtensions
{
public static DbSet<T> MockFromSql<T>(this DbSet<T> dbSet, SpAsyncEnumerableQueryable<T> spItems) where T : class
{
var queryProviderMock = new Mock<IQueryProvider>();
queryProviderMock.Setup(p => p.CreateQuery<T>(It.IsAny<MethodCallExpression>()))
.Returns<MethodCallExpression>(x => spItems);
var dbSetMock = new Mock<DbSet<T>>();
dbSetMock.As<IQueryable<T>>()
.SetupGet(q => q.Provider)
.Returns(() => queryProviderMock.Object);
dbSetMock.As<IQueryable<T>>()
.Setup(q => q.Expression)
.Returns(Expression.Constant(dbSetMock.Object));
return dbSetMock.Object;
}
}
Hope this helps!
Edits: refactored SpAsyncEnumerableQueryable class to have Add method. Got rid of parameterised construction that took array of T. Implemented IQueryProvider Provider => new Mock<IQueryProvider>().Object;
to support .AsNoTracking()
. Calling the ToList asynchronously.
If you look at the code in FromSql<T>
, you can see that it makes a call to source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>
. This is what you have to mock.
In your case, I think you can work it out with something like that:
var mockProvider = new Mock<IQueryProvider>();
mockProvider.Setup(s => s.CreateQuery(It.IsAny<MethodCallExpression>()))
.Returns(null as IQueryable);
var mockDbSet = new Mock<DbSet<AllReady.Models.ClosestLocation>>();
mockDbSet.As<IQueryable<AllReady.Models.ClosestLocation>>()
.Setup(s => s.Provider)
.Returns(mockProvider.Object);
var t = mockDbSet.Object;
context.ClosestLocations = mockDbSet.Object;
var sut = new ClosestLocationsQueryHandler(context);
var results = sut.Handle(message);
Not sure how you can Verify
on a MethodCallExpression
afterwards, but I suppose that would be possible. Alternatively, there might be a way to check the generated SQL.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With