I recently wanted to test that some custom method gets conditionally called in the componentDidMount
method of a React component.
componentDidMount() { if (this.props.initOpen) { this.methodName(); } }
I'm using Jest as my testing framework, which includes jest.fn()
for mocks/spies. I've read that this would be fairly trivial to test with Sinon, by doing something like the following:
sinon.spy(Component.prototype, "methodName"); const wrapper = mount(<Component {...props} />); expect(wrapper.instance().methodName).toHaveBeenCalled();
I'm trying to recreate this with Jest like so:
Component.prototype.methodName = jest.fn(); const wrapper = mount(<Component {...props} />); expect(wrapper.instance().methodName).toHaveBeenCalled();
This code fails and throws the following error:
jest.fn() value must be a mock function or spy. Received: function: [Function bound mockConstructor]
Is it possible to test this functionality with Jest? And if so, how?
To spy on an exported function in jest, you need to import all named exports and provide that object to the jest. spyOn function. That would look like this: import * as moduleApi from '@module/api'; // Somewhere in your test case or test suite jest.
The difference is that in mock, you are creating a complete mock or fake object while in spy, there is the real object and you just spying or stubbing specific methods of it. When using mock objects, the default behavior of the method when not stub is do nothing.
The jest. fn method allows us to create a new mock function directly. If you are mocking an object method, you can use jest.
The key is using jests spyOn
method on the object's prototype
. It should be like this:
const spy = jest.spyOn(Component.prototype, 'methodName'); const wrapper = mount(<Component {...props} />); wrapper.instance().methodName(); expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled();
As found here e.g.: Test if function is called react and enzyme
Please note it is also best practice to clear the spied function after each test run
let spy afterEach(() => { spy.mockClear() })
https://facebook.github.io/jest/docs/en/jest-object.html#jestclearallmocks
I know its a bit late, but I came across this and would suggest that to test componentDidMount
initiates the call to your nested method that your test should look something like:
Module
componentDidMount() { if (this.props.initOpen) { this.methodName(); } }
Test - Good
it('should call methodName during componentDidMount', () => { const methodNameFake = jest.spyOn(MyComponent.prototype, 'methodName'); const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent {...props} />); expect(methodNameFake).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); });
If you call componentDidMount
then the assertion that methodName
was called via componentDidMount
is more valid.
Test - Bad
it('should call methodName during componentDidMount', () => { const spy = jest.spyOn(Component.prototype, 'methodName'); const wrapper = mount(<Component {...props} />); wrapper.instance().methodName(); expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled(); }
By writing the test like this - you call the method and then assert that it was called. Which of course it will have given you just called it.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With