Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Heroku-like deployment and environment configuration via EC2

I really like the approach of a 12factor app, which you are kinda forced into, when you deploy an application to Heroku. For this question I'm particularly interested in setting environment variables for configuration, like one would do on Heroku.

As far as I can tell, there's no way to change the ENV for one or multiple instances within the EC2 console (though it's seems to be possible to set 5 ENV vars when using elastic beanstalk). Therefore my next bet on an Ubuntu based system would be to use /etc/environment, /etc/profile, ~/.profile or just the export command to set ENV variables.

Is this the correct approach or am I missing something?

And if so, is there a best practice on how to do it? I guess I could use something like Capistrano or Fabric, get a list of servers from the AWS api, connect to all of them and change the mentioned files/call export. Though 12factor is pretty well known, I couldn't find any blog post describing how to handle the ENV for a non-trivial amount of instances on EC2. And I don't want to implement such a thing, if somebody already did it very well and I just missed something.

Note: I want a solution without using elastic beanstalk and I don't care about git push deployment or any other Heroku-like feature, this is solely related to app configuration.

Any hints appreciated, thanks!

like image 374
Daniel Torres Avatar asked Feb 12 '14 13:02

Daniel Torres


People also ask

Does AWS have something like Heroku?

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is the PaaS service and the most evident competitor of Heroku. It's a service that allows deploying apps fast and simple in AWS Cloud using commands. All you need to do is to run commands using the management console or another interface by AWS.

What is the difference between Heroku and AWS?

Heroku is a container-based cloud platform offering (PaaS), whereas AWS is a secure cloud services platform providing IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS. Heroku offers you a ready-to-use environment that allows you to deploy your code fast, whereas the deployment process of AWS service is quite complicated.


1 Answers

Good question. There are many ways you can approach your deployment/environment setup.

One thing to keep in mind is that with Heroku (or Elastic Beanstalk for that matter) you only push the code. Their service takes care of the scalability factor and replication of your services across their infrastructure (once you push the code). If you are using fabric (or capistrano) you are using a push model too, but you have to take care of all the scalability/replication/fault tolerance of your application.

Having said that, if you are using EC2, in my opinion it's better if you leverage AMIs, Autoscale and Cloudformation for your deployments. This is the beauty of elasticity and Virtualization in that you can think of resources as ephemeral. You can still use fabric/capistrano to automate the AMI builds (I use Ansible) and configure environment variables, packages, etc. Then you can define a Cloudformation stack (with a JSON file) and in it you can add an autoscaling group with your prebaked AMI.

Another way of deploying your app is to simply use the AWS Opsworks service. It's pretty comprehensive and it has a lot of options but it may not be for everybody since some people may want a bit more flexibility.

If you want to go 'pull' model you can use Puppet, Chef or CFEngine. In this case you have a master policy server somewhere in the cloud (Puppetmaster, Chef Server or Policy Server). When a server gets spun up, an agent (Puppet agent, Chef Client, Cfengine agent) connects to its master to pick up its policy and then executes it. The policy may contains all the packages and environment variables that you need for your application to function. Again, it's a different model. This model scales pretty well but it depends on how many agents the master can handle and how you stagger the connections from the agents to the master. You can load balance multiple masters too if you want to scale to thousands of servers or you can just simply use multiple masters. From experience, if you want something really "fast" Cfengine works pretty good, there's a good blog comparing the speed of Puppet and CFengine here: http://www.blogcompiler.com/2012/09/30/scalability-of-cfengine-and-puppet-2/

You can also go "push" completely with tools like fabric, Ansible, Capistrano. However, you are constrained by how much a single server (or laptop) can handle multiple connections to thousands of servers that its trying to push to. This is also constrained by network bandwidth, but hey you can get creative and stagger your push updates and perhaps use multiple servers to push. Again it works and it's a different model so it depends which direction you want to go.

Hope this helps.

like image 59
Rico Avatar answered Oct 25 '22 19:10

Rico