I work on a large Scala project where we use Git for version control. My workflow is to work on new features in my own branch and switch when needed. Various releases of the code are in their own branches. All very standard.
If I have to fix a bug in a certain version of the code, I'll switch to the correct branch, fix the bug, commit then switch back to where I was.
The problem is that although git is instant at switching to another branch once I'm there I have to recompile the code. Which takes several minutes. Then fix the bug, switch back to my own branch and do another recompile, which takes another few minutes. It seems to defeat the purpose of Git being so fast.
Has anyone else encountered this? Are there ways around it. I'm sure it's not a Scala specific problem (although Scala is epically slow at compiling).
update 3+ years later
I've been using @djs answer (git-new-workdir) for the last few years. It's worked very well for me. I have a master directory and several other directories (like production, next-release etc) that I switch to when I need to do work there. There's very little overhead and it means you can quickly switch to say, production, to test something, then switch back to what you were working on.
update 7+ years later
It looks like git-worktree is the replacement for git-new-workdir. To use:
cd ~/git/my-repo git worktree add ~/git/my-linked-repo
When you switch branches, files that are not tracked by Git will remain untouched. Since Git does not know about new_file. dat , it will not just delete it. The file new_file.
when you switch to a branch without committing changes in the old branch, git tries to merge the changes to the files in the new branch. If merging is done without any conflict, swithing branches will be successful and you can see the changes in the new branch.
When you change a file in your work-tree, nothing happens to the copy in the index. It still matches the copy in the commit you chose. You have to run git add to copy the file from the work-tree, to the index.
Assuming you don't want to change your build process (hash-based instead of timestamped), you might want to look at the git-new-workdir script in the contrib directory of git source. Like the clone suggestion, you'll get multiple working copies, but instead of two independent repositories, you'll get one with multiple working copies. So, no pushing and pulling between local repositories.
It's a shell script and only runs on unix-like systems, but the concept can be replicated on modern versions of Windows.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With