To look at the last few lines of a file, use the tail command. tail works the same way as head: type tail and the filename to see the last 10 lines of that file, or type tail -number filename to see the last number lines of the file.
The tail command, as the name implies, print the last N number of data of the given input. By default it prints the last 10 lines of the specified files.
tail [OPTION]... [ Tail is a command which prints the last few number of lines (10 lines by default) of a certain file, then terminates. Example 1: By default “tail” prints the last 10 lines of a file, then exits.
As we know, Python provides multiple in-built features and modules for handling files. Let's discuss different ways to read last N lines of a file using Python. In this approach, the idea is to use a negative iterator with the readlines() function to read all the lines requested by the user from the end of file.
This may be quicker than yours. Makes no assumptions about line length. Backs through the file one block at a time till it's found the right number of '\n' characters.
def tail( f, lines=20 ):
total_lines_wanted = lines
BLOCK_SIZE = 1024
f.seek(0, 2)
block_end_byte = f.tell()
lines_to_go = total_lines_wanted
block_number = -1
blocks = [] # blocks of size BLOCK_SIZE, in reverse order starting
# from the end of the file
while lines_to_go > 0 and block_end_byte > 0:
if (block_end_byte - BLOCK_SIZE > 0):
# read the last block we haven't yet read
f.seek(block_number*BLOCK_SIZE, 2)
blocks.append(f.read(BLOCK_SIZE))
else:
# file too small, start from begining
f.seek(0,0)
# only read what was not read
blocks.append(f.read(block_end_byte))
lines_found = blocks[-1].count('\n')
lines_to_go -= lines_found
block_end_byte -= BLOCK_SIZE
block_number -= 1
all_read_text = ''.join(reversed(blocks))
return '\n'.join(all_read_text.splitlines()[-total_lines_wanted:])
I don't like tricky assumptions about line length when -- as a practical matter -- you can never know things like that.
Generally, this will locate the last 20 lines on the first or second pass through the loop. If your 74 character thing is actually accurate, you make the block size 2048 and you'll tail 20 lines almost immediately.
Also, I don't burn a lot of brain calories trying to finesse alignment with physical OS blocks. Using these high-level I/O packages, I doubt you'll see any performance consequence of trying to align on OS block boundaries. If you use lower-level I/O, then you might see a speedup.
UPDATE
for Python 3.2 and up, follow the process on bytes as In text files (those opened without a "b" in the mode string), only seeks relative to the beginning of the file are allowed (the exception being seeking to the very file end with seek(0, 2)).:
eg: f = open('C:/.../../apache_logs.txt', 'rb')
def tail(f, lines=20):
total_lines_wanted = lines
BLOCK_SIZE = 1024
f.seek(0, 2)
block_end_byte = f.tell()
lines_to_go = total_lines_wanted
block_number = -1
blocks = []
while lines_to_go > 0 and block_end_byte > 0:
if (block_end_byte - BLOCK_SIZE > 0):
f.seek(block_number*BLOCK_SIZE, 2)
blocks.append(f.read(BLOCK_SIZE))
else:
f.seek(0,0)
blocks.append(f.read(block_end_byte))
lines_found = blocks[-1].count(b'\n')
lines_to_go -= lines_found
block_end_byte -= BLOCK_SIZE
block_number -= 1
all_read_text = b''.join(reversed(blocks))
return b'\n'.join(all_read_text.splitlines()[-total_lines_wanted:])
Assumes a unix-like system on Python 2 you can do:
import os
def tail(f, n, offset=0):
stdin,stdout = os.popen2("tail -n "+n+offset+" "+f)
stdin.close()
lines = stdout.readlines(); stdout.close()
return lines[:,-offset]
For python 3 you may do:
import subprocess
def tail(f, n, offset=0):
proc = subprocess.Popen(['tail', '-n', n + offset, f], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
lines = proc.stdout.readlines()
return lines[:, -offset]
Here is my answer. Pure python. Using timeit it seems pretty fast. Tailing 100 lines of a log file that has 100,000 lines:
>>> timeit.timeit('tail.tail(f, 100, 4098)', 'import tail; f = open("log.txt", "r");', number=10)
0.0014600753784179688
>>> timeit.timeit('tail.tail(f, 100, 4098)', 'import tail; f = open("log.txt", "r");', number=100)
0.00899195671081543
>>> timeit.timeit('tail.tail(f, 100, 4098)', 'import tail; f = open("log.txt", "r");', number=1000)
0.05842900276184082
>>> timeit.timeit('tail.tail(f, 100, 4098)', 'import tail; f = open("log.txt", "r");', number=10000)
0.5394978523254395
>>> timeit.timeit('tail.tail(f, 100, 4098)', 'import tail; f = open("log.txt", "r");', number=100000)
5.377126932144165
Here is the code:
import os
def tail(f, lines=1, _buffer=4098):
"""Tail a file and get X lines from the end"""
# place holder for the lines found
lines_found = []
# block counter will be multiplied by buffer
# to get the block size from the end
block_counter = -1
# loop until we find X lines
while len(lines_found) < lines:
try:
f.seek(block_counter * _buffer, os.SEEK_END)
except IOError: # either file is too small, or too many lines requested
f.seek(0)
lines_found = f.readlines()
break
lines_found = f.readlines()
# we found enough lines, get out
# Removed this line because it was redundant the while will catch
# it, I left it for history
# if len(lines_found) > lines:
# break
# decrement the block counter to get the
# next X bytes
block_counter -= 1
return lines_found[-lines:]
If reading the whole file is acceptable then use a deque.
from collections import deque
deque(f, maxlen=n)
Prior to 2.6, deques didn't have a maxlen option, but it's easy enough to implement.
import itertools
def maxque(items, size):
items = iter(items)
q = deque(itertools.islice(items, size))
for item in items:
del q[0]
q.append(item)
return q
If it's a requirement to read the file from the end, then use a gallop (a.k.a exponential) search.
def tail(f, n):
assert n >= 0
pos, lines = n+1, []
while len(lines) <= n:
try:
f.seek(-pos, 2)
except IOError:
f.seek(0)
break
finally:
lines = list(f)
pos *= 2
return lines[-n:]
S.Lott's answer above almost works for me but ends up giving me partial lines. It turns out that it corrupts data on block boundaries because data holds the read blocks in reversed order. When ''.join(data) is called, the blocks are in the wrong order. This fixes that.
def tail(f, window=20):
"""
Returns the last `window` lines of file `f` as a list.
f - a byte file-like object
"""
if window == 0:
return []
BUFSIZ = 1024
f.seek(0, 2)
bytes = f.tell()
size = window + 1
block = -1
data = []
while size > 0 and bytes > 0:
if bytes - BUFSIZ > 0:
# Seek back one whole BUFSIZ
f.seek(block * BUFSIZ, 2)
# read BUFFER
data.insert(0, f.read(BUFSIZ))
else:
# file too small, start from begining
f.seek(0,0)
# only read what was not read
data.insert(0, f.read(bytes))
linesFound = data[0].count('\n')
size -= linesFound
bytes -= BUFSIZ
block -= 1
return ''.join(data).splitlines()[-window:]
The code I ended up using. I think this is the best so far:
def tail(f, n, offset=None):
"""Reads a n lines from f with an offset of offset lines. The return
value is a tuple in the form ``(lines, has_more)`` where `has_more` is
an indicator that is `True` if there are more lines in the file.
"""
avg_line_length = 74
to_read = n + (offset or 0)
while 1:
try:
f.seek(-(avg_line_length * to_read), 2)
except IOError:
# woops. apparently file is smaller than what we want
# to step back, go to the beginning instead
f.seek(0)
pos = f.tell()
lines = f.read().splitlines()
if len(lines) >= to_read or pos == 0:
return lines[-to_read:offset and -offset or None], \
len(lines) > to_read or pos > 0
avg_line_length *= 1.3
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With