Menu
Has anyone done a review between Phabricator and Gerrit? I am looking out for a review tool and want to settle on one based on:
Edit: I use Git
229
While GitHub supports multiple commits in one pull request, Gerrit does not. The fundamentals of Gerrit is closer to the git request-pull way of thinking (the built in way to create “pull requests” within git – not to be confused with GitHub pull requests).
Gerrit is a web-based code review tool, which is integrated with Git and built on top of Git version control system (helps developers to work together and maintain the history of their work).
If you think the web interface doesn't add anything, then Gerrit is not a good tool for you. But those are not shortcomings of Gerrit, but simply a mismatch between your preferred workflow and your preferred way of interacting with code reviews.
Gerrit uses the Change-Id information in the commit message to identify if the push is a new commit or an update of an existing change. A change consists of one or more patch sets which are used to improve the first proposal based on review comments. One patch set corresponds to one Git commit.
I've tried to compare them and these are the most prominent differences I've found
Gerrit
Phabricator
89
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
