Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Function return value in PowerShell

Tags:

powershell

People also ask

How do you get a return value from a function?

To return a value from a function, you must include a return statement, followed by the value to be returned, before the function's end statement. If you do not include a return statement or if you do not specify a value after the keyword return, the value returned by the function is unpredictable.

Can a PowerShell function return multiple values?

To return multiple values from a PowerShell function, you can return an array of objects. The following example returns the multiple values from a function num using an array. Code: function num() { $a = 4,5,6 return $a } $b=num Write-Host "The numbers are $($b[0]),$($b[1]),$($b[2])."

What does $_ do in PowerShell?

The $_ is a variable or also referred to as an operator in PowerShell that is used to retrieve only specific values from the field. It is piped with various cmdlets and used in the “Where” , “Where-Object“, and “ForEach-Object” clauses of the PowerShell.

What is $? In PowerShell?

$? Contains the execution status of the last command. It contains True if the last command succeeded and False if it failed. For cmdlets and advanced functions that are run at multiple stages in a pipeline, for example in both process and end blocks, calling this.


PowerShell has really wacky return semantics - at least when viewed from a more traditional programming perspective. There are two main ideas to wrap your head around:

  • All output is captured, and returned
  • The return keyword really just indicates a logical exit point

Thus, the following two script blocks will do effectively the exact same thing:

$a = "Hello, World"
return $a

 

$a = "Hello, World"
$a
return

The $a variable in the second example is left as output on the pipeline and, as mentioned, all output is returned. In fact, in the second example you could omit the return entirely and you would get the same behavior (the return would be implied as the function naturally completes and exits).

Without more of your function definition I can't say why you are getting a PSMethod object. My guess is that you probably have something a few lines up that is not being captured and is being placed on the output pipeline.

It is also worth noting that you probably don't need those semicolons - unless you are nesting multiple expressions on a single line.

You can read more about the return semantics on the about_Return page on TechNet, or by invoking the help return command from PowerShell itself.


This part of PowerShell is probably the most stupid aspect. Any extraneous output generated during a function will pollute the result. Sometimes there isn't any output, and then under some conditions there is some other unplanned output, in addition to your planned return value.

So, I remove the assignment from the original function call, so the output ends up on the screen, and then step through until something I didn't plan for pops out in the debugger window (using the PowerShell ISE).

Even things like reserving variables in outer scopes cause output, like [boolean]$isEnabled which will annoyingly spit a False out unless you make it [boolean]$isEnabled = $false.

Another good one is $someCollection.Add("thing") which spits out the new collection count.


With PowerShell 5 we now have the ability to create classes. Change your function into a class, and return will only return the object immediately preceding it. Here is a real simple example.

class test_class {
    [int]return_what() {
        Write-Output "Hello, World!"
        return 808979
    }
}
$tc = New-Object -TypeName test_class
$tc.return_what()

If this was a function the expected output would be

Hello World
808979

but as a class the only thing returned is the integer 808979. A class is sort of like a guarantee that it will only return the type declared or void.


As a workaround I've been returning the last object in the array that you get back from the function... It is not a great solution, but it's better than nothing:

someFunction {
   $a = "hello"
   "Function is running"
   return $a
}

$b = someFunction
$b = $b[($b.count - 1)]  # Or
$b = $b[-1]              # Simpler

All in all, a more one-lineish way of writing the same thing could be:

$b = (someFunction $someParameter $andAnotherOne)[-1]

I pass around a simple Hashtable object with a single result member to avoid the return craziness as I also want to output to the console. It acts through pass by reference.

function sample-loop($returnObj) {
  for($i = 0; $i -lt 10; $i++) {
    Write-Host "loop counter: $i"
    $returnObj.result++
  }
}

function main-sample() {
  $countObj = @{ result = 0 }
  sample-loop -returnObj $countObj
  Write-Host "_____________"
  Write-Host "Total = " ($countObj.result)
}

main-sample

You can see real example usage at my GitHub project unpackTunes.