Please help to suggest some merits and demerits of Flatbuffers and CBOR protocols. Both these binary formats claim to be good on their websites, but I am not able to make some good differences between the two.
Flatbuffers:
Advantage:
Disadvantage:
CBOR
Advantage:
Disadvantage:
PS:
It feels like managing types in CBOR will be performance costly compared to flatbuffers, but as CBOR is standardized protocol I am inclined to prefer it if this difference is not huge. Please let me know which of two will you all recommend and why.
I think you've already spelled it out quite clearly yourself. FlatBuffer's strength is being able to access the data without parsing/unpacking/allocation, which can give serious performance benefits in some scenarios. But if this doesn't matter to you, e.g. Protocol Buffers may work just as well.
Strong typing vs dynamic typing in data matters a lot too. I'd only use the latter if I wanted generic data storage with no constraints ahead of time.
Btw, if for some reason you prefer dynamic typing, but would also like to have the performance benefits of in-place access, there is actually a format that combines the two: https://google.github.io/flatbuffers/flexbuffers.html
FlatBuffers is not "proprietary". It may have been designed at Google, but it is open source and relied upon by many other companies.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With