You can use the isdigit() macro to check if a character is a number. Using this, you can easily write a function that checks a string for containing numbers only.
To check if String contains only digits in Java, call matches() method on the string object and pass the regular expression "[0-9]+" that matches only if the characters in the given string are digits.
The ISNUMERIC() function tests whether an expression is numeric. This function returns 1 if the expression is numeric, otherwise it returns 0.
bool IsDigitsOnly(string str)
{
foreach (char c in str)
{
if (c < '0' || c > '9')
return false;
}
return true;
}
Will probably be the fastest way to do it.
You could simply do this using LINQ
return str.All(char.IsDigit);
.All
returns true for empty strings and exception for null strings.char.IsDigit
is true for all Unicode characters.Here's some benchmarks based on 1000000 parses of the same string:
Updated for release
stats:
IsDigitsOnly: 384588
TryParse: 639583
Regex: 1329571
Here's the code, looks like IsDigitsOnly is faster:
class Program
{
private static Regex regex = new Regex("^[0-9]+$", RegexOptions.Compiled);
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch();
string test = int.MaxValue.ToString();
int value;
watch.Start();
for(int i=0; i< 1000000; i++)
{
int.TryParse(test, out value);
}
watch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("TryParse: "+watch.ElapsedTicks);
watch.Reset();
watch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
{
IsDigitsOnly(test);
}
watch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("IsDigitsOnly: " + watch.ElapsedTicks);
watch.Reset();
watch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
{
regex.IsMatch(test);
}
watch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("Regex: " + watch.ElapsedTicks);
Console.ReadLine();
}
static bool IsDigitsOnly(string str)
{
foreach (char c in str)
{
if (c < '0' || c > '9')
return false;
}
return true;
}
}
Of course it's worth noting that TryParse does allow leading/trailing whitespace as well as culture specific symbols. It's also limited on length of string.
The char already has an IsDigit(char c) which does this:
public static bool IsDigit(char c)
{
if (!char.IsLatin1(c))
return CharUnicodeInfo.GetUnicodeCategory(c) == UnicodeCategory.DecimalDigitNumber;
if ((int) c >= 48)
return (int) c <= 57;
else
return false;
}
You can simply do this:
var theString = "839278";
bool digitsOnly = theString.All(char.IsDigit);
Can be about 20% faster by using just one comparison per char
and for
instead of foreach
:
bool isDigits(string s)
{
if (s == null || s == "") return false;
for (int i = 0; i < s.Length; i++)
if ((s[i] ^ '0') > 9)
return false;
return true;
}
Code used for testing (always profile because the results depend on hardware, versions, order, etc.):
static bool isDigitsFr(string s) { if (s == null || s == "") return false; for (int i = 0; i < s.Length; i++) if (s[i] < '0' || s[i] > '9') return false; return true; }
static bool isDigitsFu(string s) { if (s == null || s == "") return false; for (int i = 0; i < s.Length; i++) if ((uint)(s[i] - '0') > 9) return false; return true; }
static bool isDigitsFx(string s) { if (s == null || s == "") return false; for (int i = 0; i < s.Length; i++) if ((s[i] ^ '0') > 9) return false; return true; }
static bool isDigitsEr(string s) { if (s == null || s == "") return false; foreach (char c in s) if (c < '0' || c > '9') return false; return true; }
static bool isDigitsEu(string s) { if (s == null || s == "") return false; foreach (char c in s) if ((uint)(c - '0') > 9) return false; return true; }
static bool isDigitsEx(string s) { if (s == null || s == "") return false; foreach (char c in s) if ((c ^ '0') > 9) return false; return true; }
static void test()
{
var w = new Stopwatch(); bool b; var s = int.MaxValue + ""; int r = 12345678*2; var ss = new SortedSet<string>(); //s = string.Concat(Enumerable.Range(0, 127).Select(i => ((char)i ^ '0') < 10 ? 1 : 0));
w.Restart(); for (int i = 0; i < r; i++) b = s.All(char.IsDigit); w.Stop(); ss.Add(w.Elapsed + ".All .IsDigit");
w.Restart(); for (int i = 0; i < r; i++) b = s.All(c => c >= '0' && c <= '9'); w.Stop(); ss.Add(w.Elapsed + ".All <>");
w.Restart(); for (int i = 0; i < r; i++) b = s.All(c => (c ^ '0') < 10); w.Stop(); ss.Add(w.Elapsed + " .All ^");
w.Restart(); for (int i = 0; i < r; i++) b = isDigitsFr(s); w.Stop(); ss.Add(w.Elapsed + " for <>");
w.Restart(); for (int i = 0; i < r; i++) b = isDigitsFu(s); w.Stop(); ss.Add(w.Elapsed + " for -");
w.Restart(); for (int i = 0; i < r; i++) b = isDigitsFx(s); w.Stop(); ss.Add(w.Elapsed + " for ^");
w.Restart(); for (int i = 0; i < r; i++) b = isDigitsEr(s); w.Stop(); ss.Add(w.Elapsed + " foreach <>");
w.Restart(); for (int i = 0; i < r; i++) b = isDigitsEu(s); w.Stop(); ss.Add(w.Elapsed + " foreach -");
w.Restart(); for (int i = 0; i < r; i++) b = isDigitsEx(s); w.Stop(); ss.Add(w.Elapsed + " foreach ^");
MessageBox.Show(string.Join("\n", ss)); return;
}
Results on Intel i5-3470 @ 3.2GHz, VS 2015 .NET 4.6.1 Release mode and optimizations enabled:
time method ratio
0.7776 for ^ 1.0000
0.7984 foreach - 1.0268
0.8066 foreach ^ 1.0372
0.8940 for - 1.1497
0.8976 for <> 1.1543
0.9456 foreach <> 1.2160
4.4559 .All <> 5.7303
4.7791 .All ^ 6.1458
4.8539 .All. IsDigit 6.2421
For anyone tempted to use the shorter methods, note that
.All
results in true
for empty strings and exception for null
stringschar.IsDigit
is true for all Unicode characters in the Nd category
int.TryParse
also allows white spase and sign charactersIf you are concerned about performance, use neither int.TryParse
nor Regex
- write your own (simple) function (DigitsOnly
or DigitsOnly2
below, but not DigitsOnly3
- LINQ seems to incur a significant overhead).
Also, be aware that int.TryParse
will fail if the string is too long to "fit" into int
.
This simple benchmark...
class Program {
static bool DigitsOnly(string s) {
int len = s.Length;
for (int i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
char c = s[i];
if (c < '0' || c > '9')
return false;
}
return true;
}
static bool DigitsOnly2(string s) {
foreach (char c in s) {
if (c < '0' || c > '9')
return false;
}
return true;
}
static bool DigitsOnly3(string s) {
return s.All(c => c >= '0' && c <= '9');
}
static void Main(string[] args) {
const string s1 = "916734184";
const string s2 = "916734a84";
const int iterations = 1000000;
var sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Restart();
for (int i = 0 ; i < iterations; ++i) {
bool success = DigitsOnly(s1);
bool failure = DigitsOnly(s2);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine(string.Format("DigitsOnly: {0}", sw.Elapsed));
sw.Restart();
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
bool success = DigitsOnly2(s1);
bool failure = DigitsOnly2(s2);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine(string.Format("DigitsOnly2: {0}", sw.Elapsed));
sw.Restart();
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
bool success = DigitsOnly3(s1);
bool failure = DigitsOnly3(s2);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine(string.Format("DigitsOnly3: {0}", sw.Elapsed));
sw.Restart();
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
int dummy;
bool success = int.TryParse(s1, out dummy);
bool failure = int.TryParse(s2, out dummy);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine(string.Format("int.TryParse: {0}", sw.Elapsed));
sw.Restart();
var regex = new Regex("^[0-9]+$", RegexOptions.Compiled);
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
bool success = regex.IsMatch(s1);
bool failure = regex.IsMatch(s2);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Regex.IsMatch: {0}", sw.Elapsed));
}
}
...produces the following result...
DigitsOnly: 00:00:00.0346094
DigitsOnly2: 00:00:00.0365220
DigitsOnly3: 00:00:00.2669425
int.TryParse: 00:00:00.3405548
Regex.IsMatch: 00:00:00.7017648
Function with empty validation:
public static bool IsDigitsOnly(string str)
{
return !string.IsNullOrEmpty(str) && str.All(char.IsDigit);
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With