As far as I know, do
blocks in Haskell are just some kind of syntactic sugar for monadic bind operators. For example, one could convert
main = do f <- readFile "foo.txt"
print f
print "Finished"
to
main = readFile "foo.txt" >>= print >> print "Finished"
Can all do
blocks be converted to bind syntax? What about, for example, this block where f
is used multiple times:
main = do f <- readFile "foo.txt"
print $ "prefix " ++ f
print $ f ++ " postfix"
Assuming we are in the IO monad, it is not possible to simply execute the readFile
computation twice. How can this example (if possible at all) expressed using only bind syntax?
I think using Control.Monad
is no solution, because it internally uses do
blocks.
I think it it's possible to express this using arrows (using &&&
) -- maybe this is a case where only arrows can be used as a generalization of monads?
Note that this question is not about the special examples above but about the general case of the result of a computation being used multiple times in monadic expressions like print
.
Yes, all of them can be converted to bind syntax; in fact, they are converted internally by the compiler.
I hope this translation of your example gives you the hint:
main = readFile "foo.txt" >>= \f ->
(print $ "prefix " ++ f) >>
(print $ f ++ " postfix")
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With