With two immutable classes Base and Derived (which derives from Base) I want to define Equality so that
equality is always polymorphic - that is ((Base)derived1).Equals((Base)derived2)
will call Derived.Equals
operators ==
and !=
will call Equals
rather than ReferenceEquals
(value equality)
What I did:
class Base: IEquatable<Base> {
public readonly ImmutableType1 X;
readonly ImmutableType2 Y;
public Base(ImmutableType1 X, ImmutableType2 Y) {
this.X = X;
this.Y = Y;
}
public override bool Equals(object obj) {
if (object.ReferenceEquals(this, obj)) return true;
if (obj is null || obj.GetType()!=this.GetType()) return false;
return obj is Base o
&& X.Equals(o.X) && Y.Equals(o.Y);
}
public override int GetHashCode() => HashCode.Combine(X, Y);
// boilerplate
public bool Equals(Base o) => object.Equals(this, o);
public static bool operator ==(Base o1, Base o2) => object.Equals(o1, o2);
public static bool operator !=(Base o1, Base o2) => !object.Equals(o1, o2); }
Here everything ends up in Equals(object)
which is always polymorphic so both targets are achieved.
I then derive like this:
class Derived : Base, IEquatable<Derived> {
public readonly ImmutableType3 Z;
readonly ImmutableType4 K;
public Derived(ImmutableType1 X, ImmutableType2 Y, ImmutableType3 Z, ImmutableType4 K) : base(X, Y) {
this.Z = Z;
this.K = K;
}
public override bool Equals(object obj) {
if (object.ReferenceEquals(this, obj)) return true;
if (obj is null || obj.GetType()!=this.GetType()) return false;
return obj is Derived o
&& base.Equals(obj) /* ! */
&& Z.Equals(o.Z) && K.Equals(o.K);
}
public override int GetHashCode() => HashCode.Combine(base.GetHashCode(), Z, K);
// boilerplate
public bool Equals(Derived o) => object.Equals(this, o);
}
Which is basically the same except for one gotcha - when calling base.Equals
I call base.Equals(object)
and not base.Equals(Derived)
(which will cause an endless recursion).
Also Equals(C)
will in this implementation do some boxing/unboxing but that is worth it for me.
My questions are -
First is this correct ? my (testing) seems to suggest it is but with C# being so difficult in equality I'm just not sure anymore .. are there any cases where this is wrong ?
and Second - is this good ? are there better cleaner ways to achieve this ?
Well I guess there are two parts to you problem:
Would this work? https://dotnetfiddle.net/eVLiMZ (I had to use some older syntax as it didn't compile in dotnetfiddle otherwise)
using System;
public class Program
{
public class Base
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string VarName { get; set; }
public override bool Equals(object o)
{
return object.ReferenceEquals(this, o)
|| o.GetType()==this.GetType() && ThisEquals(o);
}
protected virtual bool ThisEquals(object o)
{
Base b = o as Base;
return b != null
&& (Name == b.Name);
}
public override string ToString()
{
return string.Format("[{0}@{1} Name:{2}]", GetType(), VarName, Name);
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return Name.GetHashCode();
}
}
public class Derived : Base
{
public int Age { get; set; }
protected override bool ThisEquals(object o)
{
var d = o as Derived;
return base.ThisEquals(o)
&& d != null
&& (d.Age == Age);
}
public override string ToString()
{
return string.Format("[{0}@{1} Name:{2} Age:{3}]", GetType(), VarName, Name, Age);
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return base.GetHashCode() ^ Age.GetHashCode();
}
}
public static void Main()
{
var b1 = new Base { Name = "anna", VarName = "b1" };
var b2 = new Base { Name = "leo", VarName = "b2" };
var b3 = new Base { Name = "anna", VarName = "b3" };
var d1 = new Derived { Name = "anna", Age = 21, VarName = "d1" };
var d2 = new Derived { Name = "anna", Age = 12, VarName = "d2" };
var d3 = new Derived { Name = "anna", Age = 21, VarName = "d3" };
var all = new object [] { b1, b2, b3, d1, d2, d3 };
foreach(var a in all)
{
foreach(var b in all)
{
Console.WriteLine("{0}.Equals({1}) => {2}", a, b, a.Equals(b));
}
}
}
}
Another method would be to use Reflection to automatically compare all of your fields and properties. You just have to decorate them with the Immutable
attribute and AutoCompare()
will take care of the rest.
This will also use Reflection to build a HashCode based on your fields and properties decorated with Immutable
, and then cache it to optimize the object comparison.
public class Base : ComparableImmutable, IEquatable<Base>, IImmutable
{
[Immutable]
public ImmutableType1 X { get; set; }
[Immutable]
readonly ImmutableType2 Y;
public Base(ImmutableType1 X, ImmutableType2 Y) => (this.X, this.Y) = (X, Y);
public bool Equals(Base o) => AutoCompare(o);
}
public class Derived : Base, IEquatable<Derived>, IImmutable
{
[Immutable]
public readonly ImmutableType3 Z;
[Immutable]
readonly ImmutableType4 K;
public Derived(ImmutableType1 X, ImmutableType2 Y, ImmutableType3 Z, ImmutableType4 K)
: base(X, Y)
=> (this.Z, this.K) = (Z, K);
public bool Equals(Derived o) => AutoCompare(o);
}
[AttributeUsage(validOn: AttributeTargets.Field | AttributeTargets.Property)]
public class ImmutableAttribute : Attribute { }
public abstract class ComparableImmutable
{
static BindingFlags flags = BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.DeclaredOnly;
protected int? hashCache;
public override int GetHashCode()
{
if (hashCache is null)
{
hashCache = 0;
var type = GetType();
do
{
foreach (var field in type.GetFields(flags).Where(field => Attribute.IsDefined(field, typeof(ImmutableAttribute))))
hashCache = HashCode.Combine(hashCache, field.GetValue(this));
foreach (var property in type.GetProperties(flags).Where(property => Attribute.IsDefined(property, typeof(ImmutableAttribute))))
hashCache = HashCode.Combine(hashCache, property.GetValue(this));
type = type.BaseType;
}
while (type != null);
}
return hashCache.Value;
}
protected bool AutoCompare(object obj2)
{
if (ReferenceEquals(this, obj2)) return true;
if (obj2 is null
|| GetType() != obj2.GetType()
|| GetHashCode() != obj2.GetHashCode())
return false;
var type = GetType();
do
{
foreach (var field in type.GetFields(flags).Where(field => Attribute.IsDefined(field, typeof(ImmutableAttribute))))
{
if (field.GetValue(this) != field.GetValue(obj2))
{
return false;
}
}
foreach (var property in type.GetProperties(flags).Where(property => Attribute.IsDefined(property, typeof(ImmutableAttribute))))
{
if (property.GetValue(this) != property.GetValue(obj2))
{
return false;
}
}
type = type.BaseType;
}
while (type != null);
return true;
}
public override bool Equals(object o) => AutoCompare(o);
public static bool operator ==(Comparable o1, Comparable o2) => o1.AutoCompare(o2);
public static bool operator !=(Comparable o1, Comparable o2) => !o1.AutoCompare(o2);
}
The code can be simplified using a combination of an extension method and some boilercode. This takes almost all of the pain away and leaves classes focused on comparing their instances without having to deal with all the special edge cases:
namespace System {
public static partial class ExtensionMethods {
public static bool Equals<T>(this T inst, object obj, Func<T, bool> thisEquals) where T : IEquatable<T> =>
object.ReferenceEquals(inst, obj) // same reference -> equal
|| !(obj is null) // this is not null but obj is -> not equal
&& obj.GetType() == inst.GetType() // obj is more derived than this -> not equal
&& obj is T o // obj cannot be cast to this type -> not equal
&& thisEquals(o);
}
}
I can now do:
class Base : IEquatable<Base> {
public SomeType1 X;
SomeType2 Y;
public Base(SomeType1 X, SomeType2 Y) => (this.X, this.Y) = (X, Y);
public bool ThisEquals(Base o) => (X, Y) == (o.X, o.Y);
// boilerplate
public override bool Equals(object obj) => this.Equals(obj, ThisEquals);
public bool Equals(Base o) => object.Equals(this, o);
public static bool operator ==(Base o1, Base o2) => object.Equals(o1, o2);
public static bool operator !=(Base o1, Base o2) => !object.Equals(o1, o2);
}
class Derived : Base, IEquatable<Derived> {
public SomeType3 Z;
SomeType4 K;
public Derived(SomeType1 X, SomeType2 Y, SomeType3 Z, SomeType4 K) : base(X, Y) => (this.Z, this.K) = (Z, K);
public bool ThisEquals(Derived o) => base.ThisEquals(o) && (Z, K) == (o.Z, o.K);
// boilerplate
public override bool Equals(object obj) => this.Equals(obj, ThisEquals);
public bool Equals(Derived o) => object.Equals(this, o);
}
This is good, no casting or null checks and all the real work is clearly separated in ThisEquals
.
(testing)
For immutable classes it is possible to optimize further by caching the hashcode and using it in Equals to shortcut equality if the hashcodes are different:
namespace System.Immutable {
public interface IImmutableEquatable<T> : IEquatable<T> { };
public static partial class ExtensionMethods {
public static bool ImmutableEquals<T>(this T inst, object obj, Func<T, bool> thisEquals) where T : IImmutableEquatable<T> =>
object.ReferenceEquals(inst, obj) // same reference -> equal
|| !(obj is null) // this is not null but obj is -> not equal
&& obj.GetType() == inst.GetType() // obj is more derived than this -> not equal
&& inst.GetHashCode() == obj.GetHashCode() // optimization, hash codes are different -> not equal
&& obj is T o // obj cannot be cast to this type -> not equal
&& thisEquals(o);
public static int GetHashCode<T>(this T inst, ref int? hashCache, Func<int> thisHashCode) where T : IImmutableEquatable<T> {
if (hashCache is null) hashCache = thisHashCode();
return hashCache.Value;
}
}
}
I can now do:
class Base : IImmutableEquatable<Base> {
public readonly SomeImmutableType1 X;
readonly SomeImmutableType2 Y;
public Base(SomeImmutableType1 X, SomeImmutableType2 Y) => (this.X, this.Y) = (X, Y);
public bool ThisEquals(Base o) => (X, Y) == (o.X, o.Y);
public int ThisHashCode() => (X, Y).GetHashCode();
// boilerplate
public override bool Equals(object obj) => this.ImmutableEquals(obj, ThisEquals);
public bool Equals(Base o) => object.Equals(this, o);
public static bool operator ==(Base o1, Base o2) => object.Equals(o1, o2);
public static bool operator !=(Base o1, Base o2) => !object.Equals(o1, o2);
protected int? hashCache;
public override int GetHashCode() => this.GetHashCode(ref hashCache, ThisHashCode);
}
class Derived : Base, IImmutableEquatable<Derived> {
public readonly SomeImmutableType3 Z;
readonly SomeImmutableType4 K;
public Derived(SomeImmutableType1 X, SomeImmutableType2 Y, SomeImmutableType3 Z, SomeImmutableType4 K) : base(X, Y) => (this.Z, this.K) = (Z, K);
public bool ThisEquals(Derived o) => base.ThisEquals(o) && (Z, K) == (o.Z, o.K);
public new int ThisHashCode() => (base.ThisHashCode(), Z, K).GetHashCode();
// boilerplate
public override bool Equals(object obj) => this.ImmutableEquals(obj, ThisEquals);
public bool Equals(Derived o) => object.Equals(this, o);
public override int GetHashCode() => this.GetHashCode(ref hashCache, ThisHashCode);
}
Which is not too bad - there is more complexity but it is all just boilerplate which I just cut&paste .. the logic is clearly separated in ThisEquals
and ThisHashCode
(testing)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With