I defined a DataObject as:
public class SensorType : EntityData
{
//PKs
public string CompanyId { get; set; }
public string ServiceId { get; set; }
public string Type { get; set; }
}
And used fluent API to make CompanyId and ServiceId a composite key:
modelBuilder.Entity<SensorType>()
.HasKey(t => new { t.CompanyId, t.ServiceId });
//No autogeneration of PKs
modelBuilder.Entity<SensorType>().Property(t => t.ServiceId)
.HasDatabaseGeneratedOption(System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.Schema.DatabaseGeneratedOption.None);
modelBuilder.Entity<SensorType>().Property(t => t.CompanyId)
.HasDatabaseGeneratedOption(System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.Schema.DatabaseGeneratedOption.None);
Even though a Primary Key has been set Entity Framework creates a column named Id when I run Add-Migration:
CreateTable(
"dbo.SensorTypes",
c => new
{
CompanyId = c.String(nullable: false, maxLength: 128),
ServiceId = c.String(nullable: false, maxLength: 128),
Type = c.String(),
Id = c.String(
annotations: new Dictionary<string, AnnotationValues>
{
{
"ServiceTableColumn",
new AnnotationValues(oldValue: null, newValue: "Id")
...
})
.PrimaryKey(t => new { t.CompanyId, t.ServiceId })
.Index(t => t.CreatedAt, clustered: true);
}
How do I prevent EF from adding this column?
I suspect it has something to do with the fact that you are deriving your class from EntityData
and EntityData
has a property named Id
. My guess is that EF is getting confused because there is a property which adheres to it's key naming conventions (i.e. Id
) and an explicitly defined key.
I suspect you'll have to tell it to explicitly ignore Id
.
MSDN: EntityData Class
UPDATE:
I'm assuming that you're working with Azure for this. This SO question has some additional information in the answers which may help you find an optimal solution.
However, I agree with @Basic in his comment to your question. I generally shy away from composite keys with EF due to the complexity (and other issues) they introduce. I suspect a unique constraint on your CompanyId
and ServiceId
fields will achieve what you want without involving them in the primary key for SensorType
. That also means that you can just use the derived Id
property as your primary key and avoid the entire issue all together. I don't know if it is feasible for your implementation, but it is something to consider.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With